Airport passenger screening security services · Louisiana

Msy Louis Armstrong New Orleans Int

Kenner, LA · ~30 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.8
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Msy Louis Armstrong New Orleans Int runs at 218% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Airport passenger screening security services workplace, earning a grade F.

Msy Louis Armstrong New Orleans Int: 9.8 TCR = 218% of Airport passenger screening security services BLS 4.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Msy Louis Armstrong New Orleans Int safety composite

Msy Louis Armstrong New Orleans Int scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

16/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

DART rate
F 11.94 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Msy Louis Armstrong New Orleans Int: 0.0 → 11.9 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 17.5 TCR · DART/TCR 1.22× in 2024

Msy Louis Armstrong New Orleans Int's TCR rose 11.9 from 0.0 in 2022 to 11.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 17.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.22× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 488190 · Kenner, LA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.8 · 218% of ind

  • DART 11.9 DART
  • RANK #14/15
  • PHOTO MSPXL0001 MSPXL0001
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~30 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: MSPXL0001 MSPXL0001 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Louisiana employers → · Look up another →

Msy Louis Armstrong New Orleans Int in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Msy Louis Armstrong New Orleans Int averages 9.8 TCR (218% of the Airport passenger screening security services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Msy Louis Armstrong New Orleans Int TCR series: 2022=0 · 2023=17.5 · 2024=11.9 · BLS 4.5

Where Msy Louis Armstrong New Orleans Int falls in its industry

992 Airport passenger screening se establishments

Safer than 6% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Louisiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #14 safest of 15 Airport passenger screening se employers in Louisiana.

Msy Louis Armstrong New Orleans Int (30 employees, TCR 9.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Msy Louis Armstrong New Orleans Int
Msy Louis Armstrong New Orleans Int (30 employees, TCR 9.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Msy Louis Armstrong New Orleans Int has fewer employees than the Airport passenger screening security ser median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 11.9 11.9 2 0 0
2023 17.5 11.7 3 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

488190 · LA · Kenner

992 Airport passenger screening security services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 6,723 rated employers in Louisiana with headcount on file · 93 employers in Kenner, LA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR MSPXL0001 MSPXL0001 9.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR MOBER - ST LOUIS AIR GATEWAY 9.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR DENVER INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT (CODIA) 9.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR NYCHE - BUFFALO GATEWAY RAMP 9.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bennett Timber CO LLC 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Proserv Marine Technology 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pineville Service Plex 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Entergy Sterlington/Perryville Plant 30 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chateau Living Center of Kenner, LLC 4,304 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ochsner Medical Center - Kenner 990 FTE
CITY-NEAR MSYCX0745 MSY - UPS 643 FTE
CITY-NEAR Treasure Chest Casino 500 FTE
NAT-TCR Burkholder's Heating and Air Conditioning, Inc. 9.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 55584 Spokane 9.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 186 Homewood 9.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Kitchen Kompact, Inc. 9.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Cieszko Construction Company Inc 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Primrose Community of Lubbock 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE ESG, Inc 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Daniels Sharpsmart Inc - Shakopee 30 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.