Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Oregon

Mt. Bachelor Memory Care

Bend, OR · ~49 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.9
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mt. Bachelor Memory Care runs at 260% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Mt. Bachelor Memory Care: 9.9 TCR = 260% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mt. Bachelor Memory Care safety composite

Mt. Bachelor Memory Care scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 54% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 32%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.88 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Mt. Bachelor Memory Care: 3.0 → 8.4 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 29.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0.28× in 2023

Mt. Bachelor Memory Care's TCR rose 5.4 from 3.0 in 2016 to 8.4 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 29.8 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.28× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Bend, OR ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.9 · 260% of ind

  • DART 2.8 DART
  • RANK #111/218
  • PHOTO Goddard House
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 26 inj
  • SIZE ~49 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Goddard House (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

Mt. Bachelor Memory Care in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mt. Bachelor Memory Care averages 9.9 TCR (260% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mt. Bachelor Memory Care TCR series: 2016=3 · 2017=11.5 · 2018=7.7 · 2019=4.9 · 2020=6.8 · 2021=6.9 · 2022=29.8 · 2023=8.4 · BLS 3.8

Where Mt. Bachelor Memory Care falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 32% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #111 safest of 218 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Oregon.

Mt. Bachelor Memory Care (49 employees, TCR 9.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Mt. Bachelor Memory Care
Mt. Bachelor Memory Care (49 employees, TCR 9.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Mt. Bachelor Memory Care has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 8.4 2.8 3 0 0
2022 29.8 23.8 7 3 0
2021 6.9 4.6 3 0 0
2020 6.8 4.5 3 0 0
2019 4.9 0.0 2 0 0
2018 7.7 7.7 3 0 0
2017 11.5 11.5 4 0 0
2016 3.0 3.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · OR · Bend

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 254 employers in Bend, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Goddard House 9.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Oakmont of Huntington Beach 9.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ohio Living - Swan Creek 9.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR PSL-Cordata Court 9.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Polehn Farms Inc 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fessler Nursery Company 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE UNIVERSAL SEED LLC 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sunnyview (Shared Services + MVS Admin + Warehouse) 49 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Charles Health System Bend 3,592 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mt. Bachelor 569 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Charles Health System Redmond 505 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lonza Bend Inc, 438 FTE
NAT-TCR Roger Street Facility 9.9 TCR
NAT-TCR The Original Mattress Factory Charlotte 9.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Oak Hill Country Club 9.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Greenwell Farms Inc. - Kealakekua 9.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Herzog Railroad Services, Inc. - MPM/ClipCar 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE Orlando DC 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE M2 Global Technology, Ltd. 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE Coastal Contractors, LLC 49 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.