Homes for the elderly without nursing care · Texas

Mt. Pleasant Assisted Living

Name: Mt. Pleasant Assisted Living Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Mt. Pleasant, TX · ~22 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · September 26, 2026

D
Poor Safety Record: 5.8
Avg TCR: 3.8
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mt. Pleasant Assisted Living runs at 152% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Homes for the elderly without nursing care workplace, earning a grade D.

Mt. Pleasant Assisted Living: 5.8 TCR = 152% of Homes for the elderly without nursing care BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mt. Pleasant Assisted Living safety composite

Mt. Pleasant Assisted Living scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 62% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 16%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): C 5.76 per 100 workers

Safer than 62% of industry peers
DART rate: F 9.89 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Mt. Pleasant Assisted Living held a steady TCR band

Mt. Pleasant Assisted Living's TCR held near 0.3 from 10.2 in 2016 to 9.9 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2016 at 10.2 TCR. In 2021, DART was 1.72× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=10.2 · 2017=9.7 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=4.8 · 2021=9.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Mt. Pleasant, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.8 · 152% of ind

DART 9.9 DART
RANK #208/470
PHOTO 2248-63154
BOOK 6y book
INJ 4 inj
SIZE ~22 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 2248-63154 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

This site

5.8
2248-63154

5.8
DBA Grace Will

5.8
Longmont Regen

5.8
Brookdale Palm

5.8

What this shows Mt. Pleasant Assisted Living averages 5.8 TCR (152% of the Homes for the elderly without nursing care BLS benchmark).

Mt. Pleasant Assisted Living TCR series: 2016=10.2 · 2017=9.7 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=4.8 · 2021=9.9 · BLS 3.8

Where Mt. Pleasant Assisted Living falls in its industry

6,510 Homes for the elderly without establishments

Safer than 62% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

Grade D

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #208 safest of 470 Homes for the elderly without employers in Texas.

Mt. Pleasant Assisted Living (22 employees, TCR 5.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Mt. Pleasant Assisted Living has fewer employees than the Homes for the elderly without nursing ca median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries	Illnesses
2021	9.9	9.9	0	2
2020	4.8	4.8	0	1
2019	0.0	0.0	0	0
2018	0.0	0.0	0	0
2017	9.7	4.8	2	0
2016	10.2	5.1	2	0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · TX · Mt. Pleasant

6,510 Homes for the elderly without nursing care employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 28 employers in Mt. Pleasant, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	2248-63154	UPPER ST CLAIR, PA	5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR	DBA Grace Willowbrook	EAU CLAIRE, WI	5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Longmont Regent	LONGMONT, CO	5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Brookdale Palm Coast	PALM COAST, FL	5.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE	LQ0706 Dallas - North Central	DALLAS	22 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Radiant Plumbing and Air Conditioning	SAN ANTONIO	22 FTE
STATE-SIZE	LQ0963 Houston - Galleria Area	HOUSTON	22 FTE
STATE-SIZE	02-San Marcos	SAN MARCOS	22 FTE
CITY-NEAR	PILGRIMS MT PLEASANT WEST PLANT	Mt. Pleasant	1,543 FTE
CITY-NEAR	PILGRIMS MT. PLESANT EAST PLANT	Mt. Pleasant	559 FTE
CITY-NEAR	PILGRIMS MT PLEASANT PREPARED FOODS	Mt. Pleasant	479 FTE
CITY-NEAR	PSSI / PILGRIM'S CORP - MT. PLEASANT PREPARED	Mt. Pleasant	175 FTE
NAT-TCR	Shewmake Steel Erection	Augusta, GA	5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR	Cascade Park retirement	Woodburn, OR	5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR	CHR-Brook House	Enfield, CT	5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR	Kerkstra Precast Inc.	Grandville, MI	5.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Pittsburgh Office (3832)	Pittsburgh, PA	22 FTE
NAT-SIZE	4052 Florida Southwestern State College	Fort Myers, FL	22 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Austell BCP	Austell, GA	22 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Fidelitone - Cincinnati Bell, OH	Cincinnati, OH	22 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.