Dermatologists' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) · South Carolina

Mt Pleasant Dermatology LLC

Mt. Pleasant, SC · ~37 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
16.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mt Pleasant Dermatology LLC runs at 420% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Dermatologists' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) workplace, earning a grade F.

Mt Pleasant Dermatology LLC: 16.0 TCR = 420% of Dermatologists' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mt Pleasant Dermatology LLC safety composite

Mt Pleasant Dermatology LLC scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

38/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 15.96 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Mt Pleasant Dermatology LLC: 14.5 → 17.4 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 17.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2022

Mt Pleasant Dermatology LLC's TCR rose 2.9 from 14.5 in 2018 to 17.4 in 2022. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621111 · Mt. Pleasant, SC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 16.0 · 420% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #63/64
  • PHOTO North Hills Family M…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~37 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: North Hills Family Medical Clinic (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Mt Pleasant Dermatology LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mt Pleasant Dermatology LLC averages 16.0 TCR (420% of the Dermatologists' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mt Pleasant Dermatology LLC TCR series: 2018=14.5 · 2022=17.4 · BLS 3.8

Where Mt Pleasant Dermatology LLC falls in its industry

2,836 Dermatologists' offices (e.g., establishments

Safer than 2% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #63 safest of 64 Dermatologists' offices (e.g., employers in South Carolina.

Mt Pleasant Dermatology LLC (37 employees, TCR 16.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Mt Pleasant Dermatology LLC
Mt Pleasant Dermatology LLC (37 employees, TCR 16.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.1

Mt Pleasant Dermatology LLC has fewer employees than the Dermatologists' offices (e.g., centers, median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 17.4 0.0 4 0 0
2018 14.5 0.0 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621111 · SC · Mt. Pleasant

2,836 Dermatologists' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 31 employers in Mt. Pleasant, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR North Hills Family Medical Clinic 16.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR ADULT & PEDIATRIC DERMATOLOGY, PC-Concord, MA 16.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Family HealthCare Network - Woodlake 16.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Palo Alto Medical Foundation (378-50542) 15.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Rainey Generating Station 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fleet/Radio (Columbia) 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Storeroom Operations Center (Columbia) 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Columbia Shelving & Mirror #565 37 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wando Welch Terminal 454 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4701-345 440 FTE
CITY-NEAR Franke at Seaside 209 FTE
CITY-NEAR SCPA Headquarters 154 FTE
NAT-TCR Aspen Countertops, LLC 16.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Nampa-Caldwell Blvd #011 16.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Pilot Butte Rehabilitation Center 16.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Stertil ALM Corp 16.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Macore 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE CSW of New York, Inc. 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Baillie Lumber Co., LP - Boonville Sawmill 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Southern Tank and Manufacturing Inc. 37 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.