Motor Freight Transportation And Warehousing · Indiana

Mt Vernon - 6400 William Keck Bypass

Mt Vernon, IN · ~57 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
2.8
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mt Vernon - 6400 William Keck Bypass runs at 47% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Motor Freight Transportation And Warehousing workplace, earning a grade A.

Mt Vernon - 6400 William Keck Bypass: 2.8 TCR = 47% of Motor Freight Transportation And Warehousing BLS 5.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mt Vernon - 6400 William Keck Bypass safety composite

Mt Vernon - 6400 William Keck Bypass scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

67/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.75 per 100 workers

Safer than 60% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Mt Vernon - 6400 William Keck Bypass held a steady TCR band

Mt Vernon - 6400 William Keck Bypass's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2020 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 7.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=0.0 · 2022=7.8 · 2023=3.3 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Mt Vernon, IN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 2.8 · 47% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #176/366
  • PHOTO 30028 - CAPSTONE AWG…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~57 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 30028 - CAPSTONE AWG KANSAS CITY KS (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Mt Vernon - 6400 William Keck Bypass in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mt Vernon - 6400 William Keck Bypass averages 2.8 TCR (47% of the Motor Freight Transportation And Warehousing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mt Vernon - 6400 William Keck Bypass TCR series: 2020=0 · 2022=7.8 · 2023=3.3 · 2024=0 · BLS 5.8

Where Mt Vernon - 6400 William Keck Bypass falls in its industry

9,477 Motor Freight Transportation A establishments

Safer than 60% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #176 safest of 366 Motor Freight Transportation A employers in Indiana.

Mt Vernon - 6400 William Keck Bypass (57 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Mt Vernon - 6400 William Keck Bypass
Mt Vernon - 6400 William Keck Bypass (57 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Mt Vernon - 6400 William Keck Bypass has fewer employees than the Motor Freight Transportation And Warehou median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 3.3 1.6 2 0 0
2022 7.8 4.7 5 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · IN · Mt Vernon

9,477 Motor Freight Transportation And Warehousing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 6 employers in Mt Vernon, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 30028 - CAPSTONE AWG KANSAS CITY KS 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Advance Auto Parts DC 42 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Advance Auto Parts DC 03 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR STERIS - Distribution Center 2.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Remington Corp 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE AAA Main Office 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gatlin Plumbing & Heating, Inc. 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sullivan & Poore, Inc. 57 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mount Vernon Flour Mill 56 FTE
CITY-NEAR Parks Department 52 FTE
CITY-NEAR Home Office 46 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mt Vernon (William Keck) 35 FTE
NAT-TCR Ball Beverage Pkg 159 Glendale 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Orlando Manufacturing 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Store 0848 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Store 0593 2.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Phoenix - 6200 W Van Buren St 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Auburn - 4402 D Street NW 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bastion Technologies, Inc. - JPL 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Shold Excavating, Inc. 57 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.