Engineering research and development laboratories or services · California

Bastion Technologies, Inc. - JPL

Pasadena, CA · ~57 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.4
Avg TCR
0.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Bastion Technologies, Inc. - JPL runs at 84% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Engineering research and development laboratories or services workplace, earning a grade C.

Bastion Technologies, Inc. - JPL: 0.4 TCR = 84% of Engineering research and development laboratories or services BLS 0.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Bastion Technologies, Inc. - JPL safety composite

Bastion Technologies, Inc. - JPL scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

64/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 0.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.3

2020→2024

Bastion Technologies, Inc. - JPL injury rate improved

Bastion Technologies, Inc. - JPL's TCR fell 1.3 from 1.3 in 2020 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 1.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=1.3 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 541712 · Pasadena, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.4 · 84% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #7/32
  • PHOTO Genie TREQ Center
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~57 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Genie TREQ Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Bastion Technologies, Inc. - JPL in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Bastion Technologies, Inc. - JPL averages 0.4 TCR (84% of the Engineering research and development laboratories or services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Bastion Technologies, Inc. - JPL TCR series: 2020=1.3 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 0.5

Where Bastion Technologies, Inc. - JPL falls in its industry

319 Engineering research and devel establishments

Safer than 68% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 32 Engineering research and devel employers in California.

Bastion Technologies, Inc. - JPL (57 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 159 employees and a TCR of 0.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Bastion Technologies, Inc. - JPL
Bastion Technologies, Inc. - JPL (57 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 159 employees and a TCR of 0.8

Bastion Technologies, Inc. - JPL has fewer employees than the Engineering research and development lab median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 1.3 1.3 0 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

541712 · CA · Pasadena

319 Engineering research and development laboratories or services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 195 employers in Pasadena, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Genie TREQ Center 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 1035 N McDowell 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Barton Campus 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR P&G Test Stand Development Center 0.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bowles Farming Company 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Blanc Vineyards, LLC 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE MI RANCHITO FARMING INC 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Farmland Management Services 57 FTE
CITY-NEAR ACCO Engineered Systems 4,604 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2313-00000001 4,175 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Pasadena 2,397 FTE
CITY-NEAR Huntington Hospital 2,228 FTE
NAT-TCR Halliburton Carrollton Manufacturing and Technology Facility 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Transcon Company LLC 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 420 Charleston 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR MRS - Monroe 0.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Shold Excavating, Inc. 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Yusen Logistics (Americas) Inc - Miami 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Auburn - 4402 D Street NW 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Clean Harbors Environmental Services Inc 42CT 57 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.