Metering devices (except electrical and industrial process control) manufacturing · North Carolina

Mueller Systems

Cleveland, NC · ~169 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mueller Systems runs at 35% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Metering devices (except electrical and industrial process control) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Mueller Systems: 1.1 TCR = 35% of Metering devices (except electrical and industrial process control) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mueller Systems safety composite

Mueller Systems scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 57% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 30%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.14 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.6

2016→2024

Mueller Systems injury rate improved

Mueller Systems's TCR fell 0.6 from 1.6 in 2016 to 1.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 2.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.9× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.6 · 2017=2.1 · 2018=0.6 · 2019=1.2 · 2020=1.0 · 2021=0.5 · 2024=1.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334514 · Cleveland, NC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.1 · 35% of ind

  • DART 1.0 DART
  • RANK P57
  • PHOTO Master Meter, Inc.
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~169 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Master Meter, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Mueller Systems in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mueller Systems averages 1.1 TCR (35% of the Metering devices (except electrical and industrial process control) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mueller Systems TCR series: 2016=1.6 · 2017=2.1 · 2018=0.6 · 2019=1.2 · 2020=1 · 2021=0.5 · 2024=1 · BLS 3.3

Where Mueller Systems falls in its industry

49 Metering devices (except elect establishments

Safer than 57% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
Mueller Systems (169 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 97 employees and a TCR of 1.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Mueller Systems
Mueller Systems (169 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 97 employees and a TCR of 1.4

Mueller Systems has more employees than the Metering devices (except electrical and median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.0 1.0 1 0 0
2021 0.5 0.0 1 0 0
2020 1.0 0.5 2 0 0
2019 1.2 1.2 2 0 0
2018 0.6 0.6 1 0 0
2017 2.1 1.6 3 1 0
2016 1.6 0.5 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334514 · NC · Cleveland

49 Metering devices (except electrical and industrial process control) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 11 employers in Cleveland, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Master Meter, Inc. 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Honeywell - American Meter 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Flow Management Devices 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Reading Plant 1.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Jones-Onslow Electric Membership Corporation (Jacksonville) 169 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Pork Company II 169 FTE
STATE-SIZE Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Company 169 FTE
STATE-SIZE Burlington Finishing Plant 169 FTE
CITY-NEAR Daimler Truck North America - Cleveland Truck Plant 2,046 FTE
CITY-NEAR Daimler Trucks North America Cleveland 1,746 FTE
CITY-NEAR Daimler Truck North America - Custom Truck Services (Cleveland) 119 FTE
CITY-NEAR Shaver Wood Product 75 FTE
NAT-TCR 36 Great Valley Pkwy Malvern PA 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Lexington JIF Plant 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Middlebury Location 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Interstate Batteries of Northern Virginia 1.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Regal Beloit America, Inc Bowling Green, OH 169 FTE
NAT-SIZE South Plant - El Dorado 169 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tampa Container 169 FTE
NAT-SIZE Northwest Colorado Visiting Nurse Association 169 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.