Agriculture production or harvesting crews · California

Muranaka Farm, Inc.

Moorpark, CA · ~156 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.8
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Muranaka Farm, Inc. runs at 151% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Agriculture production or harvesting crews workplace, earning a grade D.

Muranaka Farm, Inc.: 6.8 TCR = 151% of Agriculture production or harvesting crews BLS 4.5 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Muranaka Farm, Inc. safety composite

Muranaka Farm, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 27%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

34/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.79 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.88 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Muranaka Farm, Inc.: 4.1 → 8.4 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 16.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0.57× in 2024

Muranaka Farm, Inc.'s TCR rose 4.3 from 4.1 in 2017 to 8.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 16.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.57× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 115115 · Moorpark, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 6.8 · 151% of ind

  • DART 3.9 DART
  • RANK #460/620
  • PHOTO Lexus Farm Labor Con…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 106 inj
  • SIZE ~156 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Lexus Farm Labor Contractor Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Muranaka Farm, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Muranaka Farm, Inc. averages 6.8 TCR (151% of the Agriculture production or harvesting crews BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Muranaka Farm, Inc. TCR series: 2017=4.1 · 2018=0 · 2019=12.7 · 2020=0 · 2021=16.3 · 2022=7.7 · 2023=5.2 · 2024=8.4 · BLS 4.5

Where Muranaka Farm, Inc. falls in its industry

836 Agriculture production or harv establishments

Safer than 27% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #460 safest of 620 Agriculture production or harv employers in California.

Muranaka Farm, Inc. (156 employees, TCR 6.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 107 employees and a TCR of 4.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Muranaka Farm, Inc.
Muranaka Farm, Inc. (156 employees, TCR 6.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 107 employees and a TCR of 4.4

Muranaka Farm, Inc. has more employees than the Agriculture production or harvesting cre median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 8.4 3.9 13 0 0
2023 5.2 5.2 6 0 0
2022 7.7 4.3 9 0 0
2021 16.3 13.8 13 7 0
2020 0.0 0.0 7 0 0
2019 12.7 6.6 20 3 0
2018 0.0 0.0 28 11 0
2017 4.1 3.7 10 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

115115 · CA · Moorpark

836 Agriculture production or harvesting crews employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 54 employers in Moorpark, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Lexus Farm Labor Contractor Inc 6.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR CG - 001 6.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR M.G.R. FARM LABOR CONTRACTOR 6.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Upland Farm Mangement, LLC 6.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bud of California Celery 156 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fresh Foods, Inc. 156 FTE
STATE-SIZE Villa Park Strathmore 156 FTE
STATE-SIZE Packing Plant 156 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 578 2,621 FTE
CITY-NEAR PENTAIR WATER POOL & SPA INC. 623 FTE
CITY-NEAR MAJCO INC DBA BIG BRAND TIRE & SERVICE 310 FTE
CITY-NEAR Benchmark Electronics Moorpark 213 FTE
NAT-TCR Manchester Commons 6.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Jack's Oil Distributing Inc. 6.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Great Northwest Gutters 6.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Tribal Manufacturing MI 6.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE HSC Builders & Construction Managers 156 FTE
NAT-SIZE Advanced Plastic Corporation, Inc. 156 FTE
NAT-SIZE Village of Algonquin 156 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ace Express Coaches 156 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.