Warehouse construction (e.g., commercial, industrial, manufacturing, private) · Colorado

Murray & Stafford Inc.

Denver, CO · ~64 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
3.9
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Murray & Stafford Inc. runs at 136% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Warehouse construction (e.g., commercial, industrial, manufacturing, private) workplace, earning a grade D.

Murray & Stafford Inc.: 3.9 TCR = 136% of Warehouse construction (e.g., commercial, industrial, manufacturing, private) BLS 2.9 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Murray & Stafford Inc. safety composite

Murray & Stafford Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 10%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

28/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.93 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.9 per 100 workers

Safer than 10% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Murray & Stafford Inc.: 1.4 → 4.9 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 7.2 TCR · DART/TCR 1.25× in 2024

Murray & Stafford Inc.'s TCR rose 3.6 from 1.4 in 2016 to 4.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 7.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.25× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Denver, CO ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 3.9 · 136% of ind

  • DART 4.9 DART
  • RANK #105/148
  • PHOTO Axiom Group
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~64 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Axiom Group (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Colorado employers → · Look up another →

Murray & Stafford Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Murray & Stafford Inc. averages 3.9 TCR (136% of the Warehouse construction (e.g., commercial, industrial, manufacturing, private) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Murray & Stafford Inc. TCR series: 2016=1.4 · 2017=7.2 · 2018=1.4 · 2019=5.9 · 2020=1.7 · 2021=5.1 · 2024=4.9 · BLS 2.9

Where Murray & Stafford Inc. falls in its industry

4,692 Warehouse construction (e.g., establishments

Safer than 30% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Colorado alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #105 safest of 148 Warehouse construction (e.g., employers in Colorado.

Murray & Stafford Inc. (64 employees, TCR 3.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Murray & Stafford Inc.
Murray & Stafford Inc. (64 employees, TCR 3.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Murray & Stafford Inc. has more employees than the Warehouse construction (e.g., commercial median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.9 4.9 3 0 0
2021 5.1 0.0 3 0 0
2020 1.7 1.7 1 0 0
2019 5.9 2.9 4 0 0
2018 1.4 1.4 1 0 0
2017 7.2 7.2 5 0 0
2016 1.4 1.4 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · CO · Denver

4,692 Warehouse construction (e.g., commercial, industrial, manufacturing, private) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,007 rated employers in Colorado with headcount on file · 1,757 employers in Denver, CO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Axiom Group 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rinderknecht Associates, Inc. 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR John M Frank Construction Inc 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Main 3.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Hayden Station-948 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE nationwide 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE Modern Railway Systems - All Non-Office Projects 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mays Concrete, Inc. 64 FTE
CITY-NEAR DEN DEN 9,832 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6925-DEN 6,769 FTE
CITY-NEAR DEN - Airport United Airlines Offices 5,277 FTE
CITY-NEAR CO-01 4,581 FTE
NAT-TCR Merrill Gardens at Rockridge 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR LIC 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Dave Tomasch, Inc. 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Milwaukee Valve Company Inc. - Prairie du Sac 3.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE First Mate Printing & Converting 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE D85 Irvine 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pro-Max Restoration and Paint Corp 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE Toms of Maine 64 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.