Foundation, building, poured concrete, contractors · California

Muse Concrete Contractors Inc.

Redding, CA · ~65 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.6
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Muse Concrete Contractors Inc. runs at 234% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Foundation, building, poured concrete, contractors workplace, earning a grade F.

Muse Concrete Contractors Inc.: 6.6 TCR = 234% of Foundation, building, poured concrete, contractors BLS 2.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Muse Concrete Contractors Inc. safety composite

Muse Concrete Contractors Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 25%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

36/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.56 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.2

2017→2024

Muse Concrete Contractors Inc. injury rate improved

Muse Concrete Contractors Inc.'s TCR fell 3.2 from 5.6 in 2017 to 2.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 13.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.36× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=5.6 · 2018=5.1 · 2019=11.8 · 2021=1.9 · 2022=13.0 · 2023=6.2 · 2024=2.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238110 · Redding, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 6.6 · 234% of ind

  • DART 2.4 DART
  • RANK #118/166
  • PHOTO Cascade Cement Contr…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 23 inj
  • SIZE ~65 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Cascade Cement Contracting Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Muse Concrete Contractors Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Muse Concrete Contractors Inc. averages 6.6 TCR (234% of the Foundation, building, poured concrete, contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Muse Concrete Contractors Inc. TCR series: 2017=5.6 · 2018=5.1 · 2019=11.8 · 2021=1.9 · 2022=13 · 2023=6.2 · 2024=2.4 · BLS 2.8

Where Muse Concrete Contractors Inc. falls in its industry

1,314 Foundation, building, poured c establishments

Safer than 25% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #118 safest of 166 Foundation, building, poured c employers in California.

Muse Concrete Contractors Inc. (65 employees, TCR 6.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 64 employees and a TCR of 3.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Muse Concrete Contractors Inc.
Muse Concrete Contractors Inc. (65 employees, TCR 6.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 64 employees and a TCR of 3.8

Muse Concrete Contractors Inc. has more employees than the Foundation, building, poured concrete, c median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.4 2.4 1 0 0
2023 6.2 6.2 3 0 0
2022 13.0 8.1 5 3 0
2021 1.9 1.9 1 0 0
2019 11.8 11.8 6 0 0
2018 5.1 5.1 3 0 0
2017 5.6 2.8 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238110 · CA · Redding

1,314 Foundation, building, poured concrete, contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 207 employers in Redding, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Cascade Cement Contracting Inc 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Blox Group, LLC 6.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Concrete Authority 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Metcon Ltd 6.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE SunnySlope Tree Farm, Inc. 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE Crown Nursery 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE De Jager Farms, Inc. 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE Demler Enterprises, LLC 65 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6403-64030151 1,894 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mercy Medical Center Redding 1,789 FTE
CITY-NEAR 64030151-151001 MERCY MEDICAL CENTER REDDING 1,704 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2643-64030151-151001 1,662 FTE
NAT-TCR Park & Recreation Department 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Allentown Airport Rd 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Waterproofing Specialists, Inc. 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Kansas City Airport Marriott 6.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE S08901 - WV Roll Off Services 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE S04273 - Chem Waste Landfill 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE S06695 - WM Woodbine 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE Madelia Elementary 65 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.