621910 Ambulance Services · Pennsylvania

Mutual Aid Ambulance Service, Inc

Greensburg, PA · ~259 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mutual Aid Ambulance Service, Inc runs at 218% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical 621910 Ambulance Services workplace, earning a grade F.

Mutual Aid Ambulance Service, Inc: 8.3 TCR = 218% of 621910 Ambulance Services BLS 3.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mutual Aid Ambulance Service, Inc safety composite

Mutual Aid Ambulance Service, Inc scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

50/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 8.27 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.74 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.3

2016→2024

Mutual Aid Ambulance Service, Inc injury rate improved

Mutual Aid Ambulance Service, Inc's TCR fell 4.3 from 11.4 in 2016 to 7.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 13.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.57× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=11.4 · 2018=13.0 · 2019=7.6 · 2020=7.2 · 2021=8.2 · 2022=5.0 · 2023=6.6 · 2024=7.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621910 · Greensburg, PA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 8.3 · 218% of ind

  • DART 4.7 DART
  • RANK #42/98
  • PHOTO Oahu Operations
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 135 inj
  • SIZE ~259 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Oahu Operations (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Mutual Aid Ambulance Service, Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mutual Aid Ambulance Service, Inc averages 8.3 TCR (218% of the 621910 Ambulance Services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mutual Aid Ambulance Service, Inc TCR series: 2016=11.4 · 2018=13 · 2019=7.6 · 2020=7.2 · 2021=8.2 · 2022=5 · 2023=6.6 · 2024=7.1 · BLS 3.8

Where Mutual Aid Ambulance Service, Inc falls in its industry

976 621910 Ambulance Services establishments

Safer than 50% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 8.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #42 safest of 98 621910 Ambulance Services employers in Pennsylvania.

Mutual Aid Ambulance Service, Inc (259 employees, TCR 8.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 8.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Mutual Aid Ambulance Service, Inc
Mutual Aid Ambulance Service, Inc (259 employees, TCR 8.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 8.3

Mutual Aid Ambulance Service, Inc has more employees than the 621910 Ambulance Services median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 8.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 7.1 4.7 15 0 0
2023 6.6 3.3 14 0 0
2022 5.0 2.3 11 2 0
2021 8.2 3.7 21 1 0
2020 7.2 5.7 17 2 0
2019 7.6 3.8 14 2 0
2018 13.0 6.5 23 1 0
2016 11.4 4.7 20 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621910 · PA · Greensburg

976 621910 Ambulance Services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 129 employers in Greensburg, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Oahu Operations 8.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Flint 8.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hollidaysburg American Legion Ambulance Service 8.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Able Medical Transportation 8.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Golden Triangle Construction (All Jobs) 259 FTE
STATE-SIZE MOUNTAINTOP PA (GATORADE) 259 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kurt J Lesker Company 259 FTE
STATE-SIZE Stanley Black and Decker - Allentown 259 FTE
CITY-NEAR Westmoreland Hospital 1,943 FTE
CITY-NEAR Westmoreland Regional Hospital 1,676 FTE
CITY-NEAR West Penn Power 695 FTE
CITY-NEAR Scott Electric 663 FTE
NAT-TCR General Motors Tonawanda Engine 8.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Industrial Waste Utilization, Inc. 8.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Sargent Drilling Co 8.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Red Hook West 8.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Columbus Terminal 259 FTE
NAT-SIZE Minnkota Power Cooperative, Inc. 259 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sunenergy1 259 FTE
NAT-SIZE DOT Bethesda Transp Depot 259 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.