Electric power transmission systems · North Dakota

Minnkota Power Cooperative, Inc.

Grand Forks, ND · ~259 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Minnkota Power Cooperative, Inc. runs at 156% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Electric power transmission systems workplace, earning a grade D.

Minnkota Power Cooperative, Inc.: 1.9 TCR = 156% of Electric power transmission systems BLS 1.2 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Minnkota Power Cooperative, Inc. safety composite

Minnkota Power Cooperative, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 55% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 49%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.87 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.46 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.1

2017→2024

Minnkota Power Cooperative, Inc. injury rate improved

Minnkota Power Cooperative, Inc.'s TCR fell 2.1 from 3.1 in 2017 to 0.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 3.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.25× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=3.1 · 2021=1.4 · 2022=2.0 · 2023=1.9 · 2024=0.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221121 · Grand Forks, ND ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 1.9 · 156% of ind

  • DART 0.5 DART
  • RANK #2/4
  • PHOTO Moline Customer Office
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 20 inj
  • SIZE ~259 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Moline Customer Office (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Dakota employers → · Look up another →

Minnkota Power Cooperative, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Minnkota Power Cooperative, Inc. averages 1.9 TCR (156% of the Electric power transmission systems BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Minnkota Power Cooperative, Inc. TCR series: 2017=3.1 · 2021=1.4 · 2022=2 · 2023=1.9 · 2024=0.9 · BLS 1.2

Where Minnkota Power Cooperative, Inc. falls in its industry

263 Electric power transmission sy establishments

Safer than 55% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Dakota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 4 Electric power transmission sy employers in North Dakota.

Minnkota Power Cooperative, Inc. (259 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 2.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Minnkota Power Cooperative, Inc.
Minnkota Power Cooperative, Inc. (259 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 2.2

Minnkota Power Cooperative, Inc. has more employees than the Electric power transmission systems median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.9 0.5 2 0 0
2023 1.9 1.0 3 1 0
2022 2.0 1.0 2 2 0
2021 1.4 1.4 3 0 0
2017 3.1 0.8 10 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221121 · ND · Grand Forks

263 Electric power transmission systems employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 1,696 rated employers in North Dakota with headcount on file · 175 employers in Grand Forks, ND · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Moline Customer Office 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR AMEREN MISSOURI - Substations - South 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 506-NiSource-Plymouth IN-Electric Sub 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gresham Operations Center 1.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Heart of America Medical Center 259 FTE
STATE-SIZE Baptist Home 260 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bethany on 42nd 258 FTE
STATE-SIZE Coal Creek 261 FTE
CITY-NEAR Altru Health System Med Park 2,709 FTE
CITY-NEAR LM Wind Power 907 FTE
CITY-NEAR LM Wind Power : Grand Forks 614 FTE
CITY-NEAR Valley Eldercare Center 606 FTE
NAT-TCR Contine Corporation 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Johnstown (Onsite Walmart) 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Oklahoma City Terminal 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR JTE Electrical, Inc 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE DOT Bethesda Transp Depot 259 FTE
NAT-SIZE Freudenberg-NOK LaGrange 259 FTE
NAT-SIZE Columbus Terminal 259 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mutual Aid Ambulance Service, Inc 259 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.