Construction machinery manufacturing · Texas

NA Hydraulic Excavator Facility

Victoria, TX · ~655 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

NA Hydraulic Excavator Facility runs at 33% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Construction machinery manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

NA Hydraulic Excavator Facility: 1.1 TCR = 33% of Construction machinery manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

NA Hydraulic Excavator Facility safety composite

NA Hydraulic Excavator Facility scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 90% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

71/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 1.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 90% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 64% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.6

2016→2024

NA Hydraulic Excavator Facility injury rate improved

NA Hydraulic Excavator Facility's TCR fell 0.6 from 1.7 in 2016 to 1.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 1.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.75× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.7 · 2017=1.8 · 2018=1.6 · 2019=0.8 · 2020=0.5 · 2021=1.0 · 2022=0.5 · 2023=0.7 · 2024=1.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333120 · Victoria, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.1 · 33% of ind

  • DART 0.8 DART
  • RANK #6/24
  • PHOTO Tadano America Corpo…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 51 inj
  • SIZE ~655 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Tadano America Corporation (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

NA Hydraulic Excavator Facility in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows NA Hydraulic Excavator Facility averages 1.1 TCR (33% of the Construction machinery manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

NA Hydraulic Excavator Facility TCR series: 2016=1.7 · 2017=1.8 · 2018=1.6 · 2019=0.8 · 2020=0.5 · 2021=1 · 2022=0.5 · 2023=0.7 · 2024=1.1 · BLS 3.3

Where NA Hydraulic Excavator Facility falls in its industry

400 Construction machinery manufac establishments

Safer than 90% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 24 Construction machinery manufac employers in Texas.

NA Hydraulic Excavator Facility (655 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 87 employees and a TCR of 4.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate NA Hydraulic Excavator Facility
NA Hydraulic Excavator Facility (655 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 87 employees and a TCR of 4.0

NA Hydraulic Excavator Facility has more employees than the Construction machinery manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.1 0.8 4 0 0
2023 0.7 0.7 3 0 0
2022 0.5 0.3 3 0 0
2021 1.0 0.6 4 1 0
2020 0.5 0.0 0 2 0
2019 0.8 0.2 7 0 0
2018 1.6 0.6 13 0 0
2017 1.8 1.4 10 0 0
2016 1.7 1.2 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333120 · TX · Victoria

400 Construction machinery manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 151 employers in Victoria, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Tadano America Corporation 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Roanoke 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Diamond Products Equipment Division 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR LaGrange Facility 1.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE EFW Inc. 655 FTE
STATE-SIZE 6284-YR-511 RX 655 FTE
STATE-SIZE PICCo - 6300234 Dow Gulfrsteam Poly 5 656 FTE
STATE-SIZE TX - Houston - 2400 Holly Hall - The American Bottling Company 656 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0030-HES Victoria 675 FTE
CITY-NEAR Regency IHS Therapy, LLC 657 FTE
CITY-NEAR INVISTA Victoria 571 FTE
CITY-NEAR INV Nylon Chemicals Americas, LLC 477 FTE
NAT-TCR Jokers Wild Casino 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR MEPPI110-116 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Rhinelander Mill 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Thermo Fisher Scientific - Bedford, MA Framingham, MA 1.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Clayton Parts Distribution Center 655 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lockheed Martin Corporation Bethesda HQ (1000) 655 FTE
NAT-SIZE Silfex Inc. Eaton Facility 655 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lockheed Martin Corporation US CT Shelton Far Mill Crossng (5223) 655 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.