Semiconductor devices manufacturing · Ohio

Silfex Inc. Eaton Facility

Eaton, OH · ~655 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Silfex Inc. Eaton Facility runs at 29% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Semiconductor devices manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Silfex Inc. Eaton Facility: 0.9 TCR = 29% of Semiconductor devices manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Silfex Inc. Eaton Facility safety composite

Silfex Inc. Eaton Facility scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 48%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 0.95 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.17 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.5

2016→2024

Silfex Inc. Eaton Facility injury rate improved

Silfex Inc. Eaton Facility's TCR fell 0.5 from 0.8 in 2016 to 0.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 1.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.18× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.8 · 2017=1.5 · 2018=1.5 · 2019=1.2 · 2021=1.1 · 2022=0.6 · 2023=0.5 · 2024=0.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334413 · Eaton, OH AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.9 · 29% of ind

  • DART 0.2 DART
  • RANK #3/7
  • PHOTO NXP Semiconductor Ed…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 49 inj
  • SIZE ~655 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: NXP Semiconductor Ed Bluestein (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Silfex Inc. Eaton Facility in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Silfex Inc. Eaton Facility averages 0.9 TCR (29% of the Semiconductor devices manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Silfex Inc. Eaton Facility TCR series: 2016=0.8 · 2017=1.5 · 2018=1.5 · 2019=1.2 · 2021=1.1 · 2022=0.6 · 2023=0.5 · 2024=0.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Silfex Inc. Eaton Facility falls in its industry

437 Semiconductor devices manufact establishments

Safer than 48% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 7 Semiconductor devices manufact employers in Ohio.

Silfex Inc. Eaton Facility (655 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 216 employees and a TCR of 0.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0246 Average employees Total Case Rate Silfex Inc. Eaton Facility
Silfex Inc. Eaton Facility (655 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 216 employees and a TCR of 0.9

Silfex Inc. Eaton Facility has more employees than the Semiconductor devices manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.3 0.2 2 0 0
2023 0.5 0.5 3 0 0
2022 0.6 0.4 6 0 0
2021 1.1 0.9 10 0 0
2019 1.2 0.7 7 1 0
2018 1.5 1.2 11 0 0
2017 1.5 0.5 6 3 0
2016 0.8 0.8 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334413 · OH · Eaton

437 Semiconductor devices manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 20 employers in Eaton, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR NXP Semiconductor Ed Bluestein 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Teledyne E2V Hirel 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR SolAero Technologies 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR OLEDWorks Rochester 1.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE ESI Inc. 655 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ridge Tool 655 FTE
STATE-SIZE Clayton Parts Distribution Center 655 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Gorilla Glue Company 655 FTE
CITY-NEAR Henny Penny 789 FTE
CITY-NEAR NAPM 737 FTE
CITY-NEAR Neaton Auto Products Manufacturing Inc. 713 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 5374 277 FTE
NAT-TCR Nexxt Spine LLC 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR TCCo-DEN 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Hayward, CA - 62 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Bryan Transport - South Central - Terminal 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Lockheed Martin Corporation Bethesda HQ (1000) 655 FTE
NAT-SIZE NA Hydraulic Excavator Facility 655 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lockheed Martin Corporation US CT Shelton Far Mill Crossng (5223) 655 FTE
NAT-SIZE Saracen Casino Resort 655 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.