Telecommunications equipment and wiring except transmission line installation contractors · Ohio

NA Service HVM Dayton

Dayton, OH · ~53 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.5
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

NA Service HVM Dayton runs at 16% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Telecommunications equipment and wiring except transmission line installation contractors workplace, earning a grade A.

NA Service HVM Dayton: 0.5 TCR = 16% of Telecommunications equipment and wiring except transmission line installation contractors BLS 2.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

NA Service HVM Dayton safety composite

NA Service HVM Dayton scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 95% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

78/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.45 per 100 workers

Safer than 95% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

NA Service HVM Dayton held a steady TCR band

NA Service HVM Dayton's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 2.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=0.0 · 2020=2.7 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238210 · Dayton, OH AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.5 · 16% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #8/218
  • PHOTO MEITEC, Inc.
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~53 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: MEITEC, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

NA Service HVM Dayton in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows NA Service HVM Dayton averages 0.5 TCR (16% of the Telecommunications equipment and wiring except transmission line installation contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

NA Service HVM Dayton TCR series: 2019=0 · 2020=2.7 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.8

Where NA Service HVM Dayton falls in its industry

4,550 Telecommunications equipment a establishments

Safer than 95% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 218 Telecommunications equipment a employers in Ohio.

NA Service HVM Dayton (53 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate NA Service HVM Dayton
NA Service HVM Dayton (53 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5

NA Service HVM Dayton has fewer employees than the Telecommunications equipment and wiring median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 2.7 2.7 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238210 · OH · Dayton

4,550 Telecommunications equipment and wiring except transmission line installation contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 599 employers in Dayton, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR MEITEC, Inc. 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lake Erie Electric, Inc. - Akron 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR G.R. Noto Electrical Construction, Inc. 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lone Star Corporation 0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Buckeye Lake, OH 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE Layer Site 5 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE UTI Groveport 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE Canton Transmission SC 53 FTE
CITY-NEAR Miami Valley Hospital 6,862 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Dayton 5,359 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dayton Children's Hospital 3,590 FTE
CITY-NEAR CareSource Management Services LLC 3,172 FTE
NAT-TCR Bonds & Associates, Inc. 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Triton Investments 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR BioHorizons Implant Systems, Inc. 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR QSI Harbeson 0.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Fairwinds Treatment Center 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE Coweta Greenhouses, Inc. 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE Columbia Care E. Virginia LLC dba Cannabist 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE Delta Air Lines - BDL 53 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.