General Warehousing and Storage · California

NA-US-CA-Lathrop-18601 Christopher Way

Lathrop, CA · ~179 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
2.1
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

NA-US-CA-Lathrop-18601 Christopher Way runs at 36% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical General Warehousing and Storage workplace, earning a grade A.

NA-US-CA-Lathrop-18601 Christopher Way: 2.1 TCR = 36% of General Warehousing and Storage BLS 5.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

NA-US-CA-Lathrop-18601 Christopher Way safety composite

NA-US-CA-Lathrop-18601 Christopher Way scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

71/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.5

2018→2021

NA-US-CA-Lathrop-18601 Christopher Way injury rate improved

NA-US-CA-Lathrop-18601 Christopher Way's TCR fell 1.5 from 1.5 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2019 at 4.7 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=1.5 · 2019=4.7 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Lathrop, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 2.1 · 36% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #259/1131
  • PHOTO Dependable Warehousi…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~179 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Dependable Warehousing & Distributing Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

NA-US-CA-Lathrop-18601 Christopher Way in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows NA-US-CA-Lathrop-18601 Christopher Way averages 2.1 TCR (36% of the General Warehousing and Storage BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

NA-US-CA-Lathrop-18601 Christopher Way TCR series: 2018=1.5 · 2019=4.7 · 2021=0 · BLS 5.8

Where NA-US-CA-Lathrop-18601 Christopher Way falls in its industry

9,477 General Warehousing and Storag establishments

Safer than 71% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #259 safest of 1131 General Warehousing and Storag employers in California.

NA-US-CA-Lathrop-18601 Christopher Way (179 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate NA-US-CA-Lathrop-18601 Christopher Way
NA-US-CA-Lathrop-18601 Christopher Way (179 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

NA-US-CA-Lathrop-18601 Christopher Way has more employees than the General Warehousing and Storage median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 4.7 4.7 11 1 0
2018 1.5 0.8 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · CA · Lathrop

9,477 General Warehousing and Storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 77 employers in Lathrop, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Dependable Warehousing & Distributing Inc. 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR ACI International 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Schenker Inc. Tabler Station 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 3355 NW 114th Street Miami FL 2.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Beach Cities Const/Fiel Ser - Bld: 5360 - 01 179 FTE
STATE-SIZE Inland Engineering Services 179 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sunwest Electric 179 FTE
STATE-SIZE Westech Systems, LLC 179 FTE
CITY-NEAR CALAH - LATHROP HUB 1,624 FTE
CITY-NEAR LATHROP HUB (CALAH) 970 FTE
CITY-NEAR NA-US-CA-Lathrop-Harlan Rd-Manufacturing 518 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2802_5346 516 FTE
NAT-TCR Vernon Milling Company, Inc. 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR ALS Daybreak 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Pratt Recycling Shreveport,LA. 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Edencrest Beaverdale 2.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Providence Care Center 179 FTE
NAT-SIZE US187: Dallas 407 - SG 179 FTE
NAT-SIZE US137: North Jersey 518 - SG 179 FTE
NAT-SIZE 0637 - Gypsum Co Whse 179 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.