Bonded warehousing, general merchandise · California

ACI International

Santa Fe Springs, CA · ~32 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
2.1
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

ACI International runs at 36% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Bonded warehousing, general merchandise workplace, earning a grade A.

ACI International: 2.1 TCR = 36% of Bonded warehousing, general merchandise BLS 5.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

ACI International safety composite

ACI International scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

71/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.8

2017→2024

ACI International injury rate improved

ACI International's TCR fell 5.8 from 5.8 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 5.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=5.8 · 2018=5.8 · 2019=3.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Santa Fe Springs, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 2.1 · 36% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #256/1131
  • PHOTO Dependable Warehousi…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~32 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Dependable Warehousing & Distributing Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

ACI International in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows ACI International averages 2.1 TCR (36% of the Bonded warehousing, general merchandise BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

ACI International TCR series: 2017=5.8 · 2018=5.8 · 2019=3 · 2020=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 5.8

Where ACI International falls in its industry

9,477 Bonded warehousing, general me establishments

Safer than 71% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #256 safest of 1131 Bonded warehousing, general me employers in California.

ACI International (32 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate ACI International
ACI International (32 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

ACI International has fewer employees than the Bonded warehousing, general merchandise median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 3.0 3.0 1 0 0
2018 5.8 5.8 2 0 0
2017 5.8 2.9 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · CA · Santa Fe Springs

9,477 Bonded warehousing, general merchandise employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 310 employers in Santa Fe Springs, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Dependable Warehousing & Distributing Inc. 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Schenker Inc. Tabler Station 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 3355 NW 114th Street Miami FL 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - ELP1 2.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Schreiner Farms 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE FIVE POINTS T.I.C. 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE OFFICE 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Brocchini Farms Inc. 32 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 423 3,217 FTE
CITY-NEAR CSI Electrical Contractors, Inc. 1,217 FTE
CITY-NEAR CSI 1,179 FTE
CITY-NEAR Vans Distribution Center - SFS 757 FTE
NAT-TCR J.P. Patti Tecta America LLC. 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 520 Crofton SE 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Greenville County Parks and Recreation 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Decatur Fresh Hatchery 2.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Columbus South 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE MANCHESTER 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Palmer AK Yard 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hattiesburg MS Yard 32 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.