Tool and Die Manufacturing · Michigan

NA-US-MI-Grand Rapids

Grand Rapids, MI · ~104 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

NA-US-MI-Grand Rapids runs at 145% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Tool and Die Manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

NA-US-MI-Grand Rapids: 4.8 TCR = 145% of Tool and Die Manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

NA-US-MI-Grand Rapids safety composite

NA-US-MI-Grand Rapids scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 30%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

41/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.8 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.6

2016→2024

NA-US-MI-Grand Rapids injury rate improved

NA-US-MI-Grand Rapids's TCR fell 2.6 from 4.7 in 2016 to 2.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 9.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.14× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.7 · 2017=9.5 · 2018=5.1 · 2019=3.0 · 2020=6.2 · 2021=3.0 · 2022=5.2 · 2023=4.6 · 2024=2.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333514 · Grand Rapids, MI ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.8 · 145% of ind

  • DART 0.7 DART
  • RANK #83/131
  • PHOTO American Tooling Cen…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 57 inj
  • SIZE ~104 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: American Tooling Center- Grass Lake (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

NA-US-MI-Grand Rapids in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows NA-US-MI-Grand Rapids averages 4.8 TCR (145% of the Tool and Die Manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

NA-US-MI-Grand Rapids TCR series: 2016=4.7 · 2017=9.5 · 2018=5.1 · 2019=3 · 2020=6.2 · 2021=3 · 2022=5.2 · 2023=4.6 · 2024=2 · BLS 3.3

Where NA-US-MI-Grand Rapids falls in its industry

387 Tool and Die Manufacturing establishments

Safer than 30% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #83 safest of 131 Tool and Die Manufacturing employers in Michigan.

NA-US-MI-Grand Rapids (104 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate NA-US-MI-Grand Rapids
NA-US-MI-Grand Rapids (104 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.4

NA-US-MI-Grand Rapids has more employees than the Tool and Die Manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.0 0.7 3 0 0
2023 4.6 2.0 7 0 0
2022 5.2 3.2 8 0 0
2021 3.0 0.7 3 1 0
2020 6.2 2.1 5 1 0
2019 3.0 1.0 3 0 0
2018 5.1 2.9 7 0 0
2017 9.5 3.8 15 0 0
2016 4.7 4.7 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333514 · MI · Grand Rapids

387 Tool and Die Manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 1,006 employers in Grand Rapids, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR American Tooling Center- Grass Lake 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR X-Cel Tooling, Inc. 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bronson & Bratton, Inc. 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Reich Tool & Design 4.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Superior Asphalt, Inc. 104 FTE
STATE-SIZE Diama-Shield, LLC 104 FTE
STATE-SIZE United Electrical Contractors, Inc 104 FTE
STATE-SIZE Opus Packaging - Jackson 104 FTE
CITY-NEAR SHHG-GR BUTTERWORTH CA 9,012 FTE
CITY-NEAR SH Butterworth Hospital 7,397 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mercy Health Saint Mary's Hospital-MH-MI 2,914 FTE
CITY-NEAR Steelcase - Grand Rapids / Kentwood 2,817 FTE
NAT-TCR Pearce 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR At Home Stores #13 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Schupan Aluminum & Plastic Sales Toledo 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR BFD 4.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Giant Eagle #4029 104 FTE
NAT-SIZE Giant Eagle #6375 104 FTE
NAT-SIZE Acloche LLC 104 FTE
NAT-SIZE King Arthur Baking Co., Inc. -Camelot, A-Street, BEC West 104 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.