Dies, metalworking (except threading), manufacturing · Wisconsin

Reich Tool & Design

Menomonee Falls, WI · ~57 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Reich Tool & Design runs at 145% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Dies, metalworking (except threading), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Reich Tool & Design: 4.8 TCR = 145% of Dies, metalworking (except threading), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Reich Tool & Design safety composite

Reich Tool & Design scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 74% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 30%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.78 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 74% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.8

2016→2023

Reich Tool & Design injury rate improved

Reich Tool & Design's TCR fell 4.8 from 8.3 in 2016 to 3.5 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 8.3 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=8.3 · 2017=1.5 · 2018=3.3 · 2019=3.2 · 2020=5.0 · 2021=5.3 · 2022=8.3 · 2023=3.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333514 · Menomonee Falls, WI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.8 · 145% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #22/37
  • PHOTO Bronson & Bratton, I…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 23 inj
  • SIZE ~57 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Bronson & Bratton, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Reich Tool & Design in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Reich Tool & Design averages 4.8 TCR (145% of the Dies, metalworking (except threading), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Reich Tool & Design TCR series: 2016=8.3 · 2017=1.5 · 2018=3.3 · 2019=3.2 · 2020=5 · 2021=5.3 · 2022=8.3 · 2023=3.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Reich Tool & Design falls in its industry

387 Dies, metalworking (except thr establishments

Safer than 30% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #22 safest of 37 Dies, metalworking (except thr employers in Wisconsin.

Reich Tool & Design (57 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Reich Tool & Design
Reich Tool & Design (57 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.4

Reich Tool & Design has more employees than the Dies, metalworking (except threading), m median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 3.5 0.0 2 0 0
2022 8.3 1.6 5 0 0
2021 5.3 3.5 3 0 0
2020 5.0 0.0 3 0 0
2019 3.2 3.2 2 0 0
2018 3.3 1.6 2 0 0
2017 1.5 1.5 1 0 0
2016 8.3 5.0 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333514 · WI · Menomonee Falls

387 Dies, metalworking (except threading), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 206 employers in Menomonee Falls, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Bronson & Bratton, Inc. 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Atlantic Tool & Die SEVILLE 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR NA-US-MI-Grand Rapids 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR American Tooling Center- Grass Lake 4.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Construction 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Northeast Asphalt, Inc. - Fond Du Lac 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Total Water Treatment Systems Inc. Madison 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE WATTERS PLUMBING INC 57 FTE
CITY-NEAR 900 - Corporate Offices 4,467 FTE
CITY-NEAR 900 - Corporate Office 4,231 FTE
CITY-NEAR FROEDTERT MENOMONEE FALLS HOSPITAL 1,473 FTE
CITY-NEAR Community Memorial Hospital 1,405 FTE
NAT-TCR Central Decal Company, Inc 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Buena Vista Foods 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Worcester Fair #160 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR County Market #568 4.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Combined Metals of Chicago 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bowles Farming Company 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lynchburg Svc Ctr 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE J.L. Fisher Inc. 57 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.