Commercial lithographic (offset) printing (except books) · Minnesota

Nahan Printing Saint Cloud

Saint Cloud, MN · ~385 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Nahan Printing Saint Cloud runs at 104% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Commercial lithographic (offset) printing (except books) workplace, earning a grade C.

Nahan Printing Saint Cloud: 3.4 TCR = 104% of Commercial lithographic (offset) printing (except books) BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Nahan Printing Saint Cloud safety composite

Nahan Printing Saint Cloud scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 32%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

38/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.13 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.9

2022→2024

Nahan Printing Saint Cloud injury rate improved

Nahan Printing Saint Cloud's TCR fell 0.9 from 4.0 in 2022 to 3.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 4.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.62× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=4.0 · 2023=3.2 · 2024=3.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 323111 · Saint Cloud, MN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.4 · 104% of ind

  • DART 2.1 DART
  • RANK #62/121
  • PHOTO Navitor Folders - 0116
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 34 inj
  • SIZE ~385 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Navitor Folders - 0116 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Nahan Printing Saint Cloud in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Nahan Printing Saint Cloud averages 3.4 TCR (104% of the Commercial lithographic (offset) printing (except books) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Nahan Printing Saint Cloud TCR series: 2022=4 · 2023=3.2 · 2024=3 · BLS 3.3

Where Nahan Printing Saint Cloud falls in its industry

2,001 Commercial lithographic (offse establishments

Safer than 36% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #62 safest of 121 Commercial lithographic (offse employers in Minnesota.

Nahan Printing Saint Cloud (385 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Nahan Printing Saint Cloud
Nahan Printing Saint Cloud (385 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6

Nahan Printing Saint Cloud has more employees than the Commercial lithographic (offset) printin median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.0 2.1 10 0 0
2023 3.2 3.2 10 0 0
2022 4.0 3.7 14 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

323111 · MN · Saint Cloud

2,001 Commercial lithographic (offset) printing (except books) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 65 employers in Saint Cloud, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Navitor Folders - 0116 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Seattle Manufacturing Network 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Colonial Press International 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Accent Tag & Label 3.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Alexandria Technical and Community College 385 FTE
STATE-SIZE Catholic Eldercare 385 FTE
STATE-SIZE J-Berd Mechanical 386 FTE
STATE-SIZE MN,THIEF RIVER FALLS - Downtown Campus - General Medical and Surgical Hospitals 386 FTE
CITY-NEAR CentraCare St Cloud Hospital 4,885 FTE
CITY-NEAR CentraCare Plaza 1,120 FTE
CITY-NEAR New Flyer of America 634 FTE
CITY-NEAR MN Dept of Corrections - St. Cloud 431 FTE
NAT-TCR Frontier Feedlot Dublin LLC 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Giant 756 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Summers of Marion, Inc. 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Sweetens Concrete Services, LLC. 3.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE G III LEATHER FASHIONS, INC. / CK Distribution Center 385 FTE
NAT-SIZE Atlantic Diving Supply INC 385 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nova Bus (US) Inc. 385 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lumentum 1001 Ridder Park Drive 385 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.