Position indicators (e.g., for landing gear, stabilizers), airframe equipment, manufacturing · Connecticut

Naiad Dynamics US, Inc.

Shelton, CT · ~46 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Naiad Dynamics US, Inc. runs at 245% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Position indicators (e.g., for landing gear, stabilizers), airframe equipment, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Naiad Dynamics US, Inc.: 8.1 TCR = 245% of Position indicators (e.g., for landing gear, stabilizers), airframe equipment, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Naiad Dynamics US, Inc. safety composite

Naiad Dynamics US, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

13/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.1 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.99 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Naiad Dynamics US, Inc.: 9.4 → 16.0 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 16.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0.74× in 2024

Naiad Dynamics US, Inc.'s TCR rose 6.6 from 9.4 in 2016 to 16.0 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.74× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334511 · Shelton, CT ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.1 · 245% of ind

  • DART 6.0 DART
  • RANK #4/4
  • PHOTO Leonardo DRS - 1240 …
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 34 inj
  • SIZE ~46 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Leonardo DRS - 1240 Seesetown Road (0.9 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Connecticut employers → · Look up another →

Naiad Dynamics US, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Naiad Dynamics US, Inc. averages 8.1 TCR (245% of the Position indicators (e.g., for landing gear, stabilizers), airframe equipment, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Naiad Dynamics US, Inc. TCR series: 2016=9.4 · 2017=4.8 · 2018=6.8 · 2019=8.4 · 2020=6.8 · 2021=2.4 · 2022=4.4 · 2023=14 · 2024=16 · BLS 3.3

Where Naiad Dynamics US, Inc. falls in its industry

388 Position indicators (e.g., for establishments

Safer than 0% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Connecticut alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 4 Position indicators (e.g., for employers in Connecticut.

Naiad Dynamics US, Inc. (46 employees, TCR 8.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 207 employees and a TCR of 0.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Naiad Dynamics US, Inc.
Naiad Dynamics US, Inc. (46 employees, TCR 8.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 207 employees and a TCR of 0.7

Naiad Dynamics US, Inc. has fewer employees than the Position indicators (e.g., for landing g median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 16.0 6.0 8 0 0
2023 14.0 4.0 7 0 0
2022 4.4 2.2 2 0 0
2021 2.4 2.4 1 0 0
2020 6.8 2.3 3 0 0
2019 8.4 2.1 4 0 0
2018 6.8 4.5 3 0 0
2017 4.8 4.8 2 0 0
2016 9.4 4.7 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334511 · CT · Shelton

388 Position indicators (e.g., for landing gear, stabilizers), airframe equipment, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,008 rated employers in Connecticut with headcount on file · 111 employers in Shelton, CT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Leonardo DRS - 1240 Seesetown Road 9.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Design West Technologies inc. 7.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sonatech LLC 7.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR DPI LABS, INC 6.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Haynes Materials 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE NRG Middletown Power LLC 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE Viking Construction, Inc. 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE Network Interiors, Inc. 46 FTE
CITY-NEAR AffinEco, LLC 1,740 FTE
CITY-NEAR SMG 1,487 FTE
CITY-NEAR SSC, Inc. 820 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation US CT Shelton Far Mill Crossng (5223) 655 FTE
NAT-TCR Design Homes, Inc 8.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Natick 8.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Oryana Community Co-op 8.1 TCR
NAT-TCR R+L Carriers - CER 8.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Alcon Tool Company 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE Western Container Corporation 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE ACC Construction Co., Inc 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE Castle Equipment Corporation 46 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.