Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Massachusetts

Nashoba Park

Ayer, MA · ~46 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
16.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Nashoba Park runs at 431% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Nashoba Park: 16.4 TCR = 431% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Nashoba Park safety composite

Nashoba Park scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 10%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 16.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 10% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Nashoba Park held a steady TCR band

Nashoba Park's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 42.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=16.1 · 2019=7.5 · 2020=42.9 · 2021=19.9 · 2022=35.2 · 2023=25.9 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Ayer, MA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 16.4 · 431% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #188/210
  • PHOTO Sumter Senior Living
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 23 inj
  • SIZE ~46 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Sumter Senior Living (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

Nashoba Park in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Nashoba Park averages 16.4 TCR (431% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Nashoba Park TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=16.1 · 2019=7.5 · 2020=42.9 · 2021=19.9 · 2022=35.2 · 2023=25.9 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Nashoba Park falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 10% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #188 safest of 210 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Massachusetts.

Nashoba Park (46 employees, TCR 16.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Nashoba Park
Nashoba Park (46 employees, TCR 16.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Nashoba Park has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 25.9 19.4 5 3 0
2022 35.2 35.2 4 5 0
2021 19.9 19.9 6 0 0
2020 42.9 42.9 1 13 0
2019 7.5 7.5 2 0 0
2018 16.1 0.0 5 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · MA · Ayer

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 29 employers in Ayer, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Sumter Senior Living 16.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wheeling AL MC Care Properties, LLC 16.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wesley Gardens 16.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Edgewood Spring Creek Eagle Island 16.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Verano MA CPG 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE Piledriving Job Site - 001 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE B.W. Kennedy & Company, LLC 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fuse HQ 46 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nashoba Valley Medical Center 523 FTE
CITY-NEAR Catania Spagna Corporation 227 FTE
CITY-NEAR Epic Enterprises, Inc. 178 FTE
CITY-NEAR CPF-NEHF, Inc. 176 FTE
NAT-TCR 524-526 Whalley Avenue 16.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Our Lady of Perpetual Help 16.4 TCR
NAT-TCR FLP001 16.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Sumter Senior Living 16.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Stark Truss Co., Inc. Edgerton, OH 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE Arg Rensselaer 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hartland Lubricants and Chemicals 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rogue Valley Plywood - WP 46 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.