Particle beam excitation instruments, laboratory-type, manufacturing · Wisconsin

National Electrostatics Corporation

Middleton, WI · ~85 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

National Electrostatics Corporation runs at 62% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Particle beam excitation instruments, laboratory-type, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

National Electrostatics Corporation: 2.0 TCR = 62% of Particle beam excitation instruments, laboratory-type, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

National Electrostatics Corporation safety composite

National Electrostatics Corporation scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 75% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 29%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

50/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 2.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.1

2016→2024

National Electrostatics Corporation injury rate improved

National Electrostatics Corporation's TCR fell 1.1 from 2.2 in 2016 to 1.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 7.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.2 · 2017=4.5 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=1.1 · 2021=7.3 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=1.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334516 · Middleton, WI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.0 · 62% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #6/6
  • PHOTO Elementar Americas
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~85 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Elementar Americas (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

National Electrostatics Corporation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows National Electrostatics Corporation averages 2.0 TCR (62% of the Particle beam excitation instruments, laboratory-type, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

National Electrostatics Corporation TCR series: 2016=2.2 · 2017=4.5 · 2018=0 · 2019=1.1 · 2021=7.3 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=1.1 · BLS 3.3

Where National Electrostatics Corporation falls in its industry

213 Particle beam excitation instr establishments

Safer than 29% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 6 Particle beam excitation instr employers in Wisconsin.

National Electrostatics Corporation (85 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 133 employees and a TCR of 1.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate National Electrostatics Corporation
National Electrostatics Corporation (85 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 133 employees and a TCR of 1.2

National Electrostatics Corporation has fewer employees than the Particle beam excitation instruments, la median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.1 0.0 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 7.3 7.3 5 0 0
2019 1.1 0.0 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 4.5 3.4 4 0 0
2016 2.2 1.1 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334516 · WI · Middleton

213 Particle beam excitation instruments, laboratory-type, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 104 employers in Middleton, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Elementar Americas 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lexington 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Microtrac Inc 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Omni International 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Edgewater Generating Station 85 FTE
STATE-SIZE Western Service Center-1B 85 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pitlik & Wick, Inc. 85 FTE
STATE-SIZE EGI Mechanical, Inc. 85 FTE
CITY-NEAR PPD Madison 1,279 FTE
CITY-NEAR ETC (Middleton) 841 FTE
CITY-NEAR American Girl Middleton 543 FTE
CITY-NEAR Headquarters 539 FTE
NAT-TCR 212 Fenton 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR kSARIA Corporation 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Hemphill Construction Co., Inc 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR BCI INC, dba Butler Company 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Kirkwood 85 FTE
NAT-SIZE Texas Healthcare Linen 85 FTE
NAT-SIZE Earthscapes Unlimited, Inc. 85 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Residence at Cedar Dell 85 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.