Academies, college or university · Minnesota

Natural Resources Research Institute

Duluth, MN · ~125 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
2.1
Avg TCR
1.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Natural Resources Research Institute runs at 150% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Academies, college or university workplace, earning a grade D.

Natural Resources Research Institute: 2.1 TCR = 150% of Academies, college or university BLS 1.4 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Natural Resources Research Institute safety composite

Natural Resources Research Institute scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 12%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

29/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 2.1 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.69 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Natural Resources Research Institute: 1.9 → 2.5 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 2.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0.8× in 2024

Natural Resources Research Institute's TCR rose 0.6 from 1.9 in 2018 to 2.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 2.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.8× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 611310 · Duluth, MN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 2.1 · 150% of ind

  • DART 1.7 DART
  • RANK #30/47
  • PHOTO Union College
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~125 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Union College (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Natural Resources Research Institute in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Natural Resources Research Institute averages 2.1 TCR (150% of the Academies, college or university BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Natural Resources Research Institute TCR series: 2018=1.9 · 2019=2.7 · 2020=1 · 2021=1 · 2022=2.9 · 2023=2.7 · 2024=2.5 · BLS 1.4

Where Natural Resources Research Institute falls in its industry

347 Academies, college or universi establishments

Safer than 30% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #30 safest of 47 Academies, college or universi employers in Minnesota.

Natural Resources Research Institute (125 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 617 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,0008,00010,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Natural Resources Research Institute
Natural Resources Research Institute (125 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 617 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Natural Resources Research Institute has fewer employees than the Academies, college or university median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.5 1.7 3 0 0
2023 2.7 0.9 3 0 0
2022 2.9 2.9 3 0 0
2021 1.0 1.0 1 0 0
2020 1.0 0.0 1 0 0
2019 2.7 0.9 3 0 0
2018 1.9 1.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

611310 · MN · Duluth

347 Academies, college or university employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 340 employers in Duluth, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Union College 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Eastern Connecticut State University 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR East Carolina University Health Sciences Campus 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR MINNESOTA WEST COMMUNITY & TECHNICAL COLLEGE Canby 2.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Golden Valley Svc Ctr (Bldg A) MNGV 125 FTE
STATE-SIZE CenterPoint Energy - Coon Rapids 125 FTE
STATE-SIZE TCC-Clearwater 125 FTE
STATE-SIZE Corporate Office 125 FTE
CITY-NEAR St Mary's Medical Center 3,230 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Luke's Hospital of Duluth 3,052 FTE
CITY-NEAR Building D-Miller Dwan Medical Center 1,880 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Minnesota Duluth 1,701 FTE
NAT-TCR Silver Strike Casino, LLC dba Silver Strike Casino 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Unified Packaging, Inc. 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Seaboard Foods Lp 46 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Woodland Face Veneer 2.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Palm Springs Healthcare 125 FTE
NAT-SIZE Inline Plastics, Inc. 125 FTE
NAT-SIZE Glass Craft Door Corporation 125 FTE
NAT-SIZE AZ-MTUSA-ARIZONA 125 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.