Universities · Minnesota

University of Minnesota Duluth

Duluth, MN · ~1,701 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
1.8
Avg TCR
1.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

University of Minnesota Duluth runs at 131% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Universities workplace, earning a grade D.

University of Minnesota Duluth: 1.8 TCR = 131% of Universities BLS 1.4 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

University of Minnesota Duluth safety composite

University of Minnesota Duluth scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 21%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

36/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.83 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.27 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.6

2017→2024

University of Minnesota Duluth injury rate improved

University of Minnesota Duluth's TCR fell 0.6 from 2.4 in 2017 to 1.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 2.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.69× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=2.4 · 2018=2.9 · 2019=2.1 · 2020=1.8 · 2021=1.5 · 2022=1.2 · 2023=0.9 · 2024=1.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 611310 · Duluth, MN ABOVE-IND · LARGE

Grade D · TCR 1.8 · 131% of ind

  • DART 1.3 DART
  • RANK #25/47
  • PHOTO Spelman College
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 210 inj
  • SIZE ~1,701 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Spelman College (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

University of Minnesota Duluth in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows University of Minnesota Duluth averages 1.8 TCR (131% of the Universities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

University of Minnesota Duluth TCR series: 2017=2.4 · 2018=2.9 · 2019=2.1 · 2020=1.8 · 2021=1.5 · 2022=1.2 · 2023=0.9 · 2024=1.8 · BLS 1.4

Where University of Minnesota Duluth falls in its industry

347 Universities establishments

Safer than 39% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #25 safest of 47 Universities employers in Minnesota.

University of Minnesota Duluth (1,701 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 617 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,0008,00010,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate University of Minnesota Duluth
University of Minnesota Duluth (1,701 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 617 employees and a TCR of 1.5

University of Minnesota Duluth has more employees than the Universities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.8 1.3 27 0 0
2023 0.9 0.5 13 0 0
2022 1.2 0.3 18 0 0
2021 1.5 0.9 22 0 0
2020 1.8 1.1 24 1 0
2019 2.1 1.2 30 3 0
2018 2.9 0.7 41 4 0
2017 2.4 0.5 35 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

611310 · MN · Duluth

347 Universities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 340 employers in Duluth, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Spelman College 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR A.T. Still University of Health Sciences - MO Campus 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Division 40 University of Rochester 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Smart Care Equipment Solutions 1,695 FTE
STATE-SIZE Downtown & Remote 1,694 FTE
STATE-SIZE St. Catherine University 1,711 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ryan Companies US, Inc. - Corporate 1,689 FTE
CITY-NEAR St Mary's Medical Center 3,230 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Luke's Hospital of Duluth 3,052 FTE
CITY-NEAR Building D-Miller Dwan Medical Center 1,880 FTE
CITY-NEAR ALLETE 1,231 FTE
NAT-TCR Cadillac Renewable Energy 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Dc1 & Dc2 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Stanley Black & Decker Columbus DC 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Reliable Products, Inc. 1.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ilpal - Palatine 1,701 FTE
NAT-SIZE Outsource, LLC 1,701 FTE
NAT-SIZE Comm HVAC NA and EMEA : MFG-Clarksville, TN-USA 1,701 FTE
NAT-SIZE 3841 - UDC-Suffolk 1,700 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.