General medical and surgical hospitals · Connecticut

Naugatuck Valley Surgical Center

Waterbury, CT · ~64 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
10.2
Avg TCR
7.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Naugatuck Valley Surgical Center runs at 136% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical General medical and surgical hospitals workplace, earning a grade D.

Naugatuck Valley Surgical Center: 10.2 TCR = 136% of General medical and surgical hospitals BLS 7.5 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Naugatuck Valley Surgical Center safety composite

Naugatuck Valley Surgical Center scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 6%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

18/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.17 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.09 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Naugatuck Valley Surgical Center: 4.0 → 11.8 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 26.6 TCR · DART/TCR 0.7× in 2022

Naugatuck Valley Surgical Center's TCR rose 7.8 from 4.0 in 2016 to 11.8 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2019 at 26.6 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.7× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 622110 · Waterbury, CT ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 10.2 · 136% of ind

  • DART 7.1 DART
  • RANK #83/86
  • PHOTO Spalding Rehabilitat…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 27 inj
  • SIZE ~64 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Spalding Rehabilitation Hospital (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Connecticut employers → · Look up another →

Naugatuck Valley Surgical Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Naugatuck Valley Surgical Center averages 10.2 TCR (136% of the General medical and surgical hospitals BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Naugatuck Valley Surgical Center TCR series: 2016=4 · 2017=6.1 · 2018=9.3 · 2019=26.6 · 2020=5.8 · 2021=7.7 · 2022=11.8 · BLS 7.5

Where Naugatuck Valley Surgical Center falls in its industry

6,862 General medical and surgical h establishments

Safer than 7% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Connecticut alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #83 safest of 86 General medical and surgical h employers in Connecticut.

Naugatuck Valley Surgical Center (64 employees, TCR 10.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 492 employees and a TCR of 5.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Naugatuck Valley Surgical Center
Naugatuck Valley Surgical Center (64 employees, TCR 10.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 492 employees and a TCR of 5.2

Naugatuck Valley Surgical Center has fewer employees than the General medical and surgical hospitals median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 11.8 7.1 4 1 0
2021 7.7 7.7 3 0 0
2020 5.8 2.9 2 0 0
2019 26.6 14.5 10 1 0
2018 9.3 4.7 4 0 0
2017 6.1 6.1 3 0 0
2016 4.0 0.0 1 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

622110 · CT · Waterbury

6,862 General medical and surgical hospitals employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,008 rated employers in Connecticut with headcount on file · 218 employers in Waterbury, CT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Spalding Rehabilitation Hospital 10.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sharp Mesa Vista Hospital 10.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Florida Hospital East Orlando 10.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Outpatient Pavilion - 3075 Health Center Drive 10.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Henkels & McCoy, Connecticut - Portland 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ronnie DeMeo Construction Inc. 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE Brookwood Laminating Inc. 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2967-CT32 64 FTE
CITY-NEAR Saint Mary's Hospital 1,654 FTE
CITY-NEAR Waterbury Hospital 1,472 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hartford-Saint Mary's Hospital 1,292 FTE
CITY-NEAR Naugatuck Valley Community College 1,277 FTE
NAT-TCR HG654 10.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Estwing Manufacturing Company 10.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 5472-NAI-0032-0032-04308 10.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 6962-SWY-0025-0025-00748 10.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Earle M Jorgensen-Kansas City 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mill Creek 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE RGP-ODFL 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE BASF Corporation - Converse 64 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.