Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) · Arizona

Navajo Generating Station

Page, AZ · ~495 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
2.2
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Navajo Generating Station runs at 182% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) workplace, earning a grade D.

Navajo Generating Station: 2.2 TCR = 182% of Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS 1.2 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Navajo Generating Station safety composite

Navajo Generating Station scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 33%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

39/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 2.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.5

2016→2018

Navajo Generating Station injury rate improved

Navajo Generating Station's TCR fell 1.5 from 2.5 in 2016 to 1.0 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 3.1 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.22× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.5 · 2017=3.1 · 2018=1.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221112 · Page, AZ ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 2.2 · 182% of ind

  • DART 0.5 DART
  • RANK #11/13
  • PHOTO Eunice Service Center
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 21 inj
  • SIZE ~495 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Eunice Service Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Navajo Generating Station in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Navajo Generating Station averages 2.2 TCR (182% of the Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Navajo Generating Station TCR series: 2016=2.5 · 2017=3.1 · 2018=1 · BLS 1.2

Where Navajo Generating Station falls in its industry

846 Electric power generation, fos establishments

Safer than 33% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 13 Electric power generation, fos employers in Arizona.

Navajo Generating Station (495 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Navajo Generating Station
Navajo Generating Station (495 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Navajo Generating Station has more employees than the Electric power generation, fossil fuel ( median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 1.0 0.5 3 1 0
2017 3.1 1.1 8 6 0
2016 2.5 1.2 10 4 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221112 · AZ · Page

846 Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 20 employers in Page, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Eunice Service Center 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Worley @ UCLA Energy Services Facility 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR NV Energy-Fallon 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Georgetown University Heating and Cooling Plant 2.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE TRW Vehicle Safety Systems-Mesa 494 FTE
STATE-SIZE CS2 - COMMUNITY SERVICES, EMPLOYMENT & TRAINING 494 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bombardier Commercial Service Center - Tucson 493 FTE
STATE-SIZE DPR Construction - Phoenix 492 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1442 260 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1442 237 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4021-650810900 118 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6400-SWY-0017-0017-00249 116 FTE
NAT-TCR Duraflake Particleboard 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Precise Corporate Printing, Inc 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Pioneer Pumping Services, LLC 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Lakeland Logistics 2.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Middle Atlantic Products-Fairfield 495 FTE
NAT-SIZE St Charles Health System Redmond 495 FTE
NAT-SIZE Main Office 495 FTE
NAT-SIZE Precision Dialogue 495 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.