Collection, treatment, and disposal of waste through a sewer system · Virginia

Neabsco Maintenance Facility

Woodbridge, VA · ~23 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
1.6
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Neabsco Maintenance Facility runs at 135% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Collection, treatment, and disposal of waste through a sewer system workplace, earning a grade D.

Neabsco Maintenance Facility: 1.6 TCR = 135% of Collection, treatment, and disposal of waste through a sewer system BLS 1.2 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Neabsco Maintenance Facility safety composite

Neabsco Maintenance Facility scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 83% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

74/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.62 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.9

2020→2022

Neabsco Maintenance Facility injury rate improved

Neabsco Maintenance Facility's TCR fell 4.9 from 4.9 in 2020 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2020 at 4.9 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=4.9 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221320 · Woodbridge, VA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 1.6 · 135% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #6/26
  • PHOTO Southern Development…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~23 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Southern Development and Construction (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Virginia employers → · Look up another →

Neabsco Maintenance Facility in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Neabsco Maintenance Facility averages 1.6 TCR (135% of the Collection, treatment, and disposal of waste through a sewer system BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Neabsco Maintenance Facility TCR series: 2020=4.9 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · BLS 1.2

Where Neabsco Maintenance Facility falls in its industry

400 Collection, treatment, and dis establishments

Safer than 83% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Virginia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 26 Collection, treatment, and dis employers in Virginia.

Neabsco Maintenance Facility (23 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 4.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Neabsco Maintenance Facility
Neabsco Maintenance Facility (23 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 4.4

Neabsco Maintenance Facility has fewer employees than the Collection, treatment, and disposal of w median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 4.9 4.9 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221320 · VA · Woodbridge

400 Collection, treatment, and disposal of waste through a sewer system employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,673 rated employers in Virginia with headcount on file · 124 employers in Woodbridge, VA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Southern Development and Construction 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Manson Meads Complex 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Upper Occoquan Service Authority 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Genesee County Water Treatment Plant 1.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Seamans Orchard LC 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Short Mountain Orchard Contractors, LLC 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ayrshire Farm 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE George's Broadway Hatchery 23 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sentara Northern Virginia Medical Center 1,460 FTE
CITY-NEAR Zeiders Enterprises Inc. 890 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1852 491 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wegmans Potomac Mills 055 467 FTE
NAT-TCR American Industrial Plastics LLC 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Forest Electric New York 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Mountain States Constructors Inc 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Eastern Heating & Cooling Inc. 1.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Pacific Ridge Apartments 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Armstrong Crane and Rigging Corp. 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Edison St. 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE PHC at Lauren's House-Chester County 23 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.