Crane rental with operator · Minnesota

Armstrong Crane and Rigging Corp.

New Brighton, MN · ~23 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.8
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Armstrong Crane and Rigging Corp. runs at 100% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Crane rental with operator workplace, earning a grade C.

Armstrong Crane and Rigging Corp.: 2.8 TCR = 100% of Crane rental with operator BLS 2.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Armstrong Crane and Rigging Corp. safety composite

Armstrong Crane and Rigging Corp. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 40%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.8 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.8

2017→2022

Armstrong Crane and Rigging Corp. injury rate improved

Armstrong Crane and Rigging Corp.'s TCR fell 7.8 from 7.8 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2017 at 7.8 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=7.8 · 2018=4.2 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=4.9 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238990 · New Brighton, MN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.8 · 100% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #9/30
  • PHOTO Tesar Industrial Con…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~23 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Tesar Industrial Contractors (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Armstrong Crane and Rigging Corp. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Armstrong Crane and Rigging Corp. averages 2.8 TCR (100% of the Crane rental with operator BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Armstrong Crane and Rigging Corp. TCR series: 2017=7.8 · 2018=4.2 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=4.9 · 2022=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Armstrong Crane and Rigging Corp. falls in its industry

1,634 Crane rental with operator establishments

Safer than 40% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 30 Crane rental with operator employers in Minnesota.

Armstrong Crane and Rigging Corp. (23 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Armstrong Crane and Rigging Corp.
Armstrong Crane and Rigging Corp. (23 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Armstrong Crane and Rigging Corp. has fewer employees than the Crane rental with operator median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 4.9 0.0 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 4.2 4.2 1 0 0
2017 7.8 3.9 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238990 · MN · New Brighton

1,634 Crane rental with operator employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 80 employers in New Brighton, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Tesar Industrial Contractors 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Barkley Construction, LLC 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pool Works, Inc. 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR American Fence - Phoenix, AZ 2.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Brooten 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE United Dairy, Alpha Foods, LLP 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE MNHT-SEL-HIGHWAY 12' 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fergus Falls CSC 23 FTE
CITY-NEAR API Construction 396 FTE
CITY-NEAR GRUMA CORPORATION 339 FTE
CITY-NEAR Aqseptence Group, Inc.- Johnson Screens 250 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pentair Flow Technologies LLC New Brighton 229 FTE
NAT-TCR Coastal Bend Cooperative Gin 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Amcor Flexibles Asheville 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Fisher Container Holdings, LLC. 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Fire-Seal LLC 2.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Pacific Ridge Apartments 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Neabsco Maintenance Facility 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wellington Operations Center 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Edison St. 23 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.