Paper mills (except newsprint, uncoated groundwood paper mills) · Wisconsin

Neenah Filtration Appleton

Appleton, WI · ~131 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Neenah Filtration Appleton runs at 72% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Paper mills (except newsprint, uncoated groundwood paper mills) workplace, earning a grade B.

Neenah Filtration Appleton: 2.4 TCR = 72% of Paper mills (except newsprint, uncoated groundwood paper mills) BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Neenah Filtration Appleton safety composite

Neenah Filtration Appleton scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 28%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

41/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.39 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.53 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Neenah Filtration Appleton: 0.8 → 2.5 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 3.9 TCR · DART/TCR 1.06× in 2020

Neenah Filtration Appleton's TCR rose 1.8 from 0.8 in 2017 to 2.5 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2019 at 3.9 TCR. In 2020, DART was 1.06× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322121 · Appleton, WI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.4 · 72% of ind

  • DART 2.5 DART
  • RANK #20/41
  • PHOTO Procter & Gamble Pap…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~131 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Procter & Gamble Paper Products (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Neenah Filtration Appleton in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Neenah Filtration Appleton averages 2.4 TCR (72% of the Paper mills (except newsprint, uncoated groundwood paper mills) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Neenah Filtration Appleton TCR series: 2017=0.8 · 2019=3.9 · 2020=2.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Neenah Filtration Appleton falls in its industry

317 Paper mills (except newsprint, establishments

Safer than 46% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #20 safest of 41 Paper mills (except newsprint, employers in Wisconsin.

Neenah Filtration Appleton (131 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 146 employees and a TCR of 2.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Neenah Filtration Appleton
Neenah Filtration Appleton (131 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 146 employees and a TCR of 2.2

Neenah Filtration Appleton has fewer employees than the Paper mills (except newsprint, uncoated median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 2.5 2.5 2 1 0
2019 3.9 1.3 5 1 0
2017 0.8 0.8 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322121 · WI · Appleton

317 Paper mills (except newsprint, uncoated groundwood paper mills) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 356 employers in Appleton, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Procter & Gamble Paper Products 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cascades Tissue Group North Carolina - Rockingham 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Menasha, WI - Paper - B280 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR delta paper corporation 2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE The Kraemer Company 131 FTE
STATE-SIZE Riverside Foods, Inc. 131 FTE
STATE-SIZE Oh Snap! Pickling Co., LLC 131 FTE
STATE-SIZE Foremost Farms USA (Richland Center, WI) 131 FTE
CITY-NEAR ThedaCare Regional Medical Center Appleton 1,649 FTE
CITY-NEAR ThedaCare Regional Medical Center-Appleton 1,563 FTE
CITY-NEAR Northern Operations 1,321 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fox Valley Technical College (WI) 1,279 FTE
NAT-TCR LancasterHyundai 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Production 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Jackson Elementary 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Howard Elementary 2.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Parallel Technologies 131 FTE
NAT-SIZE Holiday Inn/Bennigans 131 FTE
NAT-SIZE ARYZTA - Newark 131 FTE
NAT-SIZE Oppermann Webbing 131 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.