Paper mills (except newsprint, uncoated groundwood paper mills) · Wisconsin

Procter & Gamble Paper Products

Green Bay, WI · ~641 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Procter & Gamble Paper Products runs at 72% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Paper mills (except newsprint, uncoated groundwood paper mills) workplace, earning a grade B.

Procter & Gamble Paper Products: 2.4 TCR = 72% of Paper mills (except newsprint, uncoated groundwood paper mills) BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Procter & Gamble Paper Products safety composite

Procter & Gamble Paper Products scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 46%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Procter & Gamble Paper Products: 1.2 → 3.1 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 3.1 TCR · DART/TCR 0.2× in 2018

Procter & Gamble Paper Products's TCR rose 2.0 from 1.2 in 2016 to 3.1 in 2018. In 2018, DART was 0.2× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322121 · Green Bay, WI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.4 · 72% of ind

  • DART 0.5 DART
  • RANK #19/41
  • PHOTO Cascades Tissue Grou…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~641 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Cascades Tissue Group North Carolina - Rockingham (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Procter & Gamble Paper Products in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Procter & Gamble Paper Products averages 2.4 TCR (72% of the Paper mills (except newsprint, uncoated groundwood paper mills) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Procter & Gamble Paper Products TCR series: 2016=1.2 · 2017=2.8 · 2018=3.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Procter & Gamble Paper Products falls in its industry

317 Paper mills (except newsprint, establishments

Safer than 46% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #19 safest of 41 Paper mills (except newsprint, employers in Wisconsin.

Procter & Gamble Paper Products (641 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 146 employees and a TCR of 2.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Procter & Gamble Paper Products
Procter & Gamble Paper Products (641 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 146 employees and a TCR of 2.2

Procter & Gamble Paper Products has more employees than the Paper mills (except newsprint, uncoated median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 3.1 0.5 3 17 0
2017 2.8 0.6 4 16 0
2016 1.2 0.4 4 4 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322121 · WI · Green Bay

317 Paper mills (except newsprint, uncoated groundwood paper mills) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 563 employers in Green Bay, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Cascades Tissue Group North Carolina - Rockingham 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Menasha, WI - Paper - B280 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gold Bond Building Products 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Neenah Filtration Appleton 2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE GEHC : Madison WI, HCS 641 FTE
STATE-SIZE CR Meyer 642 FTE
STATE-SIZE Franklin Public Schools 640 FTE
STATE-SIZE SMC Drive 637 FTE
CITY-NEAR WI005 - WI-Green Bay-CSBC 3,595 FTE
CITY-NEAR WI-Green Bay-CSBC 3,296 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hospital Campus 2,413 FTE
CITY-NEAR 300000170855522 - WI-Green Bay-CSBC 2,379 FTE
NAT-TCR Lake Wales Clinic Corporation 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Compassionate Care Hospice of Lakeland 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR ZOETIS - Salisbury 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Edwards Wood Products - Alamance Plant 2.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE CS Wholesale Grocers : North Hatfield, MA (PDC) 641 FTE
NAT-SIZE East Texas Medical Center Emergency Medical Services (Smith County) 641 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bay Springs, MS Processing Plant 641 FTE
NAT-SIZE Chula Vista (Cachv) 641 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.