Continuing care retirement communities · Pennsylvania

New Heritage Towers

Doylestown, PA · ~224 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.7
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

New Heritage Towers runs at 124% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Continuing care retirement communities workplace, earning a grade D.

New Heritage Towers: 4.7 TCR = 124% of Continuing care retirement communities BLS 3.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

New Heritage Towers safety composite

New Heritage Towers scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 71% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

63/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.29 per 100 workers

Safer than 61% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.5

2016→2024

New Heritage Towers injury rate improved

New Heritage Towers's TCR fell 5.5 from 7.8 in 2016 to 2.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 8.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.49× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=7.8 · 2017=3.7 · 2018=4.1 · 2019=3.5 · 2020=8.8 · 2021=1.2 · 2022=5.8 · 2023=5.2 · 2024=2.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Doylestown, PA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.7 · 124% of ind

  • DART 2.3 DART
  • RANK #59/257
  • PHOTO Garden Building - Ma…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 49 inj
  • SIZE ~224 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Garden Building - ManorView (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

New Heritage Towers in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows New Heritage Towers averages 4.7 TCR (124% of the Continuing care retirement communities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

New Heritage Towers TCR series: 2016=7.8 · 2017=3.7 · 2018=4.1 · 2019=3.5 · 2020=8.8 · 2021=1.2 · 2022=5.8 · 2023=5.2 · 2024=2.3 · BLS 3.8

Where New Heritage Towers falls in its industry

4,127 Continuing care retirement com establishments

Safer than 71% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #59 safest of 257 Continuing care retirement com employers in Pennsylvania.

New Heritage Towers (224 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate New Heritage Towers
New Heritage Towers (224 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

New Heritage Towers has more employees than the Continuing care retirement communities median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.3 2.3 3 0 0
2023 5.2 3.7 7 0 0
2022 5.8 3.6 4 4 0
2021 1.2 0.6 2 0 0
2020 8.8 8.3 2 13 0
2019 3.5 3.0 6 0 0
2018 4.1 2.9 7 0 0
2017 3.7 1.8 6 0 0
2016 7.8 5.8 12 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · PA · Doylestown

4,127 Continuing care retirement communities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 49 employers in Doylestown, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Garden Building - ManorView 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Covenant Living of Turlock 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Highlands 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Walden's View 4.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Main Office 224 FTE
STATE-SIZE Flinchbaugh Engineering Inc. 224 FTE
STATE-SIZE General Cable Williamsport 224 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cooper-Booth Wholesale Company 224 FTE
CITY-NEAR Doylestown Hospital 2,734 FTE
CITY-NEAR Doylestown Health 2,664 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pine Run Village 536 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pine Run Ferry Road 405 FTE
NAT-TCR Concord Care Center 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR The Fresh Market 001 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Chocolove - 1180 S 57th Court 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR The Fresh Market 218 4.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Knoxville 224 FTE
NAT-SIZE Synergy Flavors, Inc. 224 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kyger Creek Station 224 FTE
NAT-SIZE Quality Custom Distribution - Charlotte 224 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.