Cosmetics merchant wholesalers · New Jersey

New Jersey - Piscataway Facility

Piscataway, NJ · ~307 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
3.8
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

New Jersey - Piscataway Facility runs at 171% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Cosmetics merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade D.

New Jersey - Piscataway Facility: 3.8 TCR = 171% of Cosmetics merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

New Jersey - Piscataway Facility safety composite

New Jersey - Piscataway Facility scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 30%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

39/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.76 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.4

2016→2021

New Jersey - Piscataway Facility injury rate improved

New Jersey - Piscataway Facility's TCR fell 3.4 from 6.8 in 2016 to 3.3 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2016 at 6.8 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.89× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.8 · 2017=4.3 · 2018=3.7 · 2019=1.3 · 2020=3.2 · 2021=3.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 424210 · Piscataway, NJ ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 3.8 · 171% of ind

  • DART 3.3 DART
  • RANK #23/32
  • PHOTO Gilchrist & Soames -…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 41 inj
  • SIZE ~307 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Gilchrist & Soames - Plainfield, Indiana (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

New Jersey - Piscataway Facility in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows New Jersey - Piscataway Facility averages 3.8 TCR (171% of the Cosmetics merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

New Jersey - Piscataway Facility TCR series: 2016=6.8 · 2017=4.3 · 2018=3.7 · 2019=1.3 · 2020=3.2 · 2021=3.3 · BLS 2.2

Where New Jersey - Piscataway Facility falls in its industry

514 Cosmetics merchant wholesalers establishments

Safer than 41% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #23 safest of 32 Cosmetics merchant wholesalers employers in New Jersey.

New Jersey - Piscataway Facility (307 employees, TCR 3.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 2.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate New Jersey - Piscataway Facility
New Jersey - Piscataway Facility (307 employees, TCR 3.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 2.9

New Jersey - Piscataway Facility has more employees than the Cosmetics merchant wholesalers median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 3.3 3.3 4 4 0
2020 3.2 1.4 8 1 0
2019 1.3 0.6 3 1 0
2018 3.7 3.0 8 2 0
2017 4.3 3.1 6 5 0
2016 6.8 3.4 12 10 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

424210 · NJ · Piscataway

514 Cosmetics merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 124 employers in Piscataway, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Gilchrist & Soames - Plainfield, Indiana 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sysco Guest Supply LLC. (Garland, TX) 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 10194000 10194000-ABDC CHICAGO 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 470 3.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE US Beverage Packers, LLC 307 FTE
STATE-SIZE Basking Ridge Office - Ericsson 307 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Jersey City Municipal Utilities Authority 306 FTE
STATE-SIZE Nicholson Corp. 306 FTE
CITY-NEAR Global Technology Center, Colgate - Palmolive 1,042 FTE
CITY-NEAR Colgate-Palmolive Global Technology Center 978 FTE
CITY-NEAR Colgate-Palmolive Company 978 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ferraro Foods 733 FTE
NAT-TCR 4769-501-Williams Sonoma 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Serta Grovetown 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Cherryville Location 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Olivet Nazarene-Univ Dining Rm 3.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Presort Services- Indianapolis 307 FTE
NAT-SIZE SunPower Corp. - SPSV San Jose B 51 307 FTE
NAT-SIZE Arapahoe Basin Ski Area 307 FTE
NAT-SIZE Renaissance Schaumburg Convention Center Hotel 307 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.