Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) · Missouri

New Madrid Power Plant

Marston, MO · ~187 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
2.8
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

New Madrid Power Plant runs at 230% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) workplace, earning a grade F.

New Madrid Power Plant: 2.8 TCR = 230% of Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS 1.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

New Madrid Power Plant safety composite

New Madrid Power Plant scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 24%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

33/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 2.76 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.11 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.4

2016→2024

New Madrid Power Plant injury rate improved

New Madrid Power Plant's TCR fell 1.4 from 3.1 in 2016 to 1.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 7.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.4× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.1 · 2017=3.0 · 2018=1.5 · 2019=2.1 · 2020=7.4 · 2021=2.2 · 2022=1.2 · 2023=2.7 · 2024=1.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221112 · Marston, MO ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 2.8 · 230% of ind

  • DART 1.1 DART
  • RANK #27/42
  • PHOTO Hawthorn Generating …
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 38 inj
  • SIZE ~187 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hawthorn Generating Station (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

New Madrid Power Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows New Madrid Power Plant averages 2.8 TCR (230% of the Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

New Madrid Power Plant TCR series: 2016=3.1 · 2017=3 · 2018=1.5 · 2019=2.1 · 2020=7.4 · 2021=2.2 · 2022=1.2 · 2023=2.7 · 2024=1.7 · BLS 1.2

Where New Madrid Power Plant falls in its industry

846 Electric power generation, fos establishments

Safer than 24% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #27 safest of 42 Electric power generation, fos employers in Missouri.

New Madrid Power Plant (187 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate New Madrid Power Plant
New Madrid Power Plant (187 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5

New Madrid Power Plant has more employees than the Electric power generation, fossil fuel ( median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.7 1.1 3 0 0
2023 2.7 1.1 4 1 0
2022 1.2 1.2 2 0 0
2021 2.2 2.2 4 0 0
2020 7.4 6.2 7 6 0
2019 2.1 1.0 4 0 0
2018 1.5 0.0 3 0 0
2017 3.0 2.0 6 0 0
2016 3.1 1.5 5 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221112 · MO · Marston

846 Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 8 employers in Marston, MO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hawthorn Generating Station 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Plant McIntosh Steam 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Basin Electric Power Cooperative - Dry Fork Station 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Riverside Gen Plant-TK 2.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Multi-Craft Contractors - Springfield 187 FTE
STATE-SIZE PCI KC Interior 187 FTE
STATE-SIZE D&L Painting and Drywall, LLC 187 FTE
STATE-SIZE Quaker Window Co. - Vinyl Facility 187 FTE
CITY-NEAR Magnitude 7 Metals, LLC 394 FTE
CITY-NEAR Riceland Foods - New Madrid 70 FTE
CITY-NEAR Riceland Foods Incorporated, New Madrid 66 FTE
CITY-NEAR 70871 53 FTE
NAT-TCR Clinton Field Services 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR So Goodwill Corporate Office 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Ecore International - Lancaster 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Food Market La Chiquita 2.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ultrafab NY 187 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lenawee Medical Care Facility 187 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sault Tribal Health Center 187 FTE
NAT-SIZE Berry Global - Syracuse 187 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.