Fossil Fuel Electric Generation · Minnesota

Riverside Gen Plant-TK

Minneapolis, MN · ~26 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
2.7
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Riverside Gen Plant-TK runs at 228% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Fossil Fuel Electric Generation workplace, earning a grade F.

Riverside Gen Plant-TK: 2.7 TCR = 228% of Fossil Fuel Electric Generation BLS 1.2 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Riverside Gen Plant-TK safety composite

Riverside Gen Plant-TK scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 71% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 24%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 2.74 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Riverside Gen Plant-TK: 0.0 → 4.1 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 4.1 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2023

Riverside Gen Plant-TK's TCR rose 4.1 from 0.0 in 2021 to 4.1 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 4.1 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221112 · Minneapolis, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 2.7 · 228% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #11/24
  • PHOTO KCP&L - Johnson Coun…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~26 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: KCP&L - Johnson County Service Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Riverside Gen Plant-TK in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Riverside Gen Plant-TK averages 2.7 TCR (228% of the Fossil Fuel Electric Generation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Riverside Gen Plant-TK TCR series: 2021=0 · 2022=4.1 · 2023=4.1 · BLS 1.2

Where Riverside Gen Plant-TK falls in its industry

846 Fossil Fuel Electric Generatio establishments

Safer than 24% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 24 Fossil Fuel Electric Generatio employers in Minnesota.

Riverside Gen Plant-TK (26 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Riverside Gen Plant-TK
Riverside Gen Plant-TK (26 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Riverside Gen Plant-TK has fewer employees than the Fossil Fuel Electric Generation median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 4.1 0.0 0 1 0
2022 4.1 0.0 0 1 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221112 · MN · Minneapolis

846 Fossil Fuel Electric Generation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 1,321 employers in Minneapolis, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR KCP&L - Johnson County Service Center 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR New Madrid Power Plant 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Muscatine Power & Water Power Plant 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sherco Generating Plant 2.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Becker 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Silverstreak Dairy LLC, Silverstreak Dairy 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Schwartz Farms Huiras MN 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Golden Egg 26 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Minnesota Twin Cities 22,522 FTE
CITY-NEAR MN950 MN TELECOMMUTER 12,021 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0501 - City Center 8,459 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hennepin County Medical Center 7,030 FTE
NAT-TCR 602 - Meridian 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Unit #1493 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Unit #0559 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 951WDM 2.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Borger Service Center-132 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hydro Maintenance Bldg Wissota-1Z 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE McCoys Building Supply-El Paso 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE VA.RICHM.86 - Ricoh Usa, Inc 26 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.