Assisted Living · Minnesota

New Perspective - Highland Park

Name: New Perspective - Highland Park Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

St. Paul, MN · ~100 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

B
Good Safety Record: 2.8
Avg TCR: 3.8
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

New Perspective - Highland Park runs at 74% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Assisted Living workplace, earning a grade B.

New Perspective - Highland Park: 2.8 TCR = 74% of Assisted Living BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

New Perspective - Highland Park safety composite

New Perspective - Highland Park scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 43%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): B 2.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers
DART rate: D 4.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

New Perspective - Highland Park: 3.0 → 4.1 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 6.2 TCR · DART/TCR 1.47× in 2023

New Perspective - Highland Park's TCR rose 1.2 from 3.0 in 2017 to 4.1 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 6.2 TCR. In 2023, DART was 1.47× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · St. Paul, MN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.8 · 74% of ind

DART 4.1 DART
RANK #41/240
PHOTO Copper Creek Inn
BOOK 7y book
INJ 11 inj
SIZE ~100 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Copper Creek Inn (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

This site

2.8
Copper Creek I

2.8
Valley Manor

2.8
63029 SUNRISE

2.8
Heywood Wakefi

2.8

What this shows New Perspective - Highland Park averages 2.8 TCR (74% of the Assisted Living BLS benchmark).

New Perspective - Highland Park TCR series: 2017=3 · 2018=0 · 2019=2.7 · 2020=6.2 · 2021=1.9 · 2022=1.8 · 2023=4.1 · BLS 3.8

Where New Perspective - Highland Park falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted Living establishments

Safer than 86% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

Grade B

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #41 safest of 240 Assisted Living employers in Minnesota.

New Perspective - Highland Park (100 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

New Perspective - Highland Park has more employees than the Assisted Living median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries	Illnesses
2023	4.1	4.1	2	0
2022	1.8	1.8	0	1
2021	1.9	1.9	1	0
2020	6.2	6.2	4	0
2019	2.7	1.3	2	0
2018	0.0	0.0	0	0
2017	3.0	3.0	2	0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · MN · St. Paul

6,510 Assisted Living employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 370 employers in St. Paul, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	Copper Creek Inn	CHANDLER, AZ	2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Valley Manor	ROCHESTER, NY	2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR	63029 SUNRISE OF LINCOLN PARK	CHICAGO, IL	2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Heywood Wakefield Common	GARDENER, MA	2.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE	WARNING LITES OF MN	MINNEAPOLIS	100 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Abhe & Svoboda, Inc.	JORDAN	100 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Public Works Department	ROCHESTER	100 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Rochester Plumbing & Heating	ROCHESTER	100 FTE
CITY-NEAR	YCID	St. Paul	5,214 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Boston Scientific CRM	St. Paul	5,100 FTE
CITY-NEAR	United Hospital	St. Paul	3,384 FTE
CITY-NEAR	IT Campus	St. Paul	2,409 FTE
NAT-TCR	NPX ONE Indianapolis	Indianapolis, IN	2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR	Mattox Plumbing	West Allis, WI	2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR	Hampton Roads Mechanical of Virginia	Chesapeake, VA	2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR	Buffalo Framing and Truss	Pflugerville, TX	2.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE	The Metalworking Group - Pippin Road	Cincinnati, OH	100 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Public Works	Bethel, CT	100 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Wheatlands Health Care Center	Kingman, KS	100 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Whitewater Creek, Inc.	Hayden, ID	100 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.