Oil and gas field services (except contract drilling, site preparation and related construction contractor activities) on a contract basis · Texas

New Waverly

New Waverly, TX · ~24 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
1.6
Avg TCR
1.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

New Waverly runs at 87% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Oil and gas field services (except contract drilling, site preparation and related construction contractor activities) on a contract basis workplace, earning a grade C.

New Waverly: 1.6 TCR = 87% of Oil and gas field services (except contract drilling, site preparation and related construction contractor activities) on a contract basis BLS 1.9 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

New Waverly safety composite

New Waverly scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 77% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 24%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

50/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 1.65 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.3

2022→2023

New Waverly injury rate improved

New Waverly's TCR fell 3.3 from 3.3 in 2022 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 3.3 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=3.3 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 213112 · New Waverly, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 1.6 · 87% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #157/196
  • PHOTO Clean Harbors Explor…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~24 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Clean Harbors Exploration Services Inc 87KQL (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

New Waverly in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows New Waverly averages 1.6 TCR (87% of the Oil and gas field services (except contract drilling, site preparation and related construction contractor activities) on a contract basis BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

New Waverly TCR series: 2022=3.3 · 2023=0 · BLS 1.9

Where New Waverly falls in its industry

467 Oil and gas field services (ex establishments

Safer than 24% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #157 safest of 196 Oil and gas field services (ex employers in Texas.

New Waverly (24 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 122 employees and a TCR of 0.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 012345 Average employees Total Case Rate New Waverly
New Waverly (24 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 122 employees and a TCR of 0.9

New Waverly has fewer employees than the Oil and gas field services (except contr median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 3.3 3.3 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

213112 · TX · New Waverly

467 Oil and gas field services (except contract drilling, site preparation and related construction contractor activities) on a contract basis employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 7 employers in New Waverly, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Clean Harbors Exploration Services Inc 87KQL 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fluid Disposal Specialties , Inc. 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pioneer Oil Company Inc 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR POI, LA 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Treesap Farms LLC - Sales 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Springlake Dairy LLC 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pineywoods Farm 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Darty Gin Inc 24 FTE
CITY-NEAR Craig Godwin Inc DBA United Machine Works 123 FTE
CITY-NEAR GCTC-INC-GULF COAST TRADES CTR, TX 72 FTE
CITY-NEAR Solid Bridge Construction 57 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hayes Concrete Services, LLC 28 FTE
NAT-TCR Andys Iga 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR AK003 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR CA006 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR TR Construction 1.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Mesa Moving and Storage Boise 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mesa Moving and Storage Bozeman, LLC 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Boynton Beach FL 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fridley MN 24 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.