Construction management, water and sewage treatment plant · North Carolina

Charles R. Underwood, Inc.

Sanford, NC · ~80 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.3
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Charles R. Underwood, Inc. runs at 12% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Construction management, water and sewage treatment plant workplace, earning a grade A.

Charles R. Underwood, Inc.: 0.3 TCR = 12% of Construction management, water and sewage treatment plant BLS 2.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Charles R. Underwood, Inc. safety composite

Charles R. Underwood, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 99% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

71/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 99% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.78 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Charles R. Underwood, Inc.: 0.0 → 0.8 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 1.6 TCR · DART/TCR 2.29× in 2023

Charles R. Underwood, Inc.'s TCR rose 0.8 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.8 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 1.6 TCR. In 2023, DART was 2.29× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237110 · Sanford, NC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.3 · 12% of ind

  • DART 0.8 DART
  • RANK #2/55
  • PHOTO Flow-Line Constructi…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~80 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Flow-Line Construction, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Charles R. Underwood, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Charles R. Underwood, Inc. averages 0.3 TCR (12% of the Construction management, water and sewage treatment plant BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Charles R. Underwood, Inc. TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=1.6 · 2023=0.8 · BLS 2.8

Where Charles R. Underwood, Inc. falls in its industry

1,614 Construction management, water establishments

Safer than 99% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 55 Construction management, water employers in North Carolina.

Charles R. Underwood, Inc. (80 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Charles R. Underwood, Inc.
Charles R. Underwood, Inc. (80 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Charles R. Underwood, Inc. has more employees than the Construction management, water and sewag median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.8 0.8 1 0 0
2022 1.6 1.6 2 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237110 · NC · Sanford

1,614 Construction management, water and sewage treatment plant employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 121 employers in Sanford, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Flow-Line Construction, Inc. 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Murphy Pipeline Contractor 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Don Moorhead Construction, Inc. 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Centerline, Inc. 0.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Tri- Hishtil 808241 80 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bentwood Farms Inc. 80 FTE
STATE-SIZE Davidson Water, Inc. 80 FTE
STATE-SIZE Beam Construction Company, Inc. 80 FTE
CITY-NEAR Coty US LLC 1,264 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pentair Sanford Hawkins Ave 937 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sanford, NC 772 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pentair Water Pool and Spa 768 FTE
NAT-TCR PCL Construction Services Inc. 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR New York Independent System Operator, Inc. 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Cox Machine Inc 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR AU Health System, Inc 0.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Comfort Systems USA Intermountain 80 FTE
NAT-SIZE Builders Choice Lumber LLC 80 FTE
NAT-SIZE Luvata Appleton Carter Ct. 80 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pratt ( Target Container) , Inc. 80 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.