General warehousing and storage · Missouri

Newell Brands - Neosho Service Center

Neosho, MO · ~259 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.8
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Newell Brands - Neosho Service Center runs at 14% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical General warehousing and storage workplace, earning a grade A.

Newell Brands - Neosho Service Center: 0.8 TCR = 14% of General warehousing and storage BLS 5.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Newell Brands - Neosho Service Center safety composite

Newell Brands - Neosho Service Center scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 92% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

79/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 92% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Newell Brands - Neosho Service Center held a steady TCR band

Newell Brands - Neosho Service Center's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.8 in 2022 to 0.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 0.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=0.8 · 2023=0.7 · 2024=0.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Neosho, MO AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.8 · 14% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #13/179
  • PHOTO Wabtec Manufacturing…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~259 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Wabtec Manufacturing Solutions TXD (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

Newell Brands - Neosho Service Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Newell Brands - Neosho Service Center averages 0.8 TCR (14% of the General warehousing and storage BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Newell Brands - Neosho Service Center TCR series: 2022=0.8 · 2023=0.7 · 2024=0.8 · BLS 5.8

Where Newell Brands - Neosho Service Center falls in its industry

9,477 General warehousing and storag establishments

Safer than 92% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #13 safest of 179 General warehousing and storag employers in Missouri.

Newell Brands - Neosho Service Center (259 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Newell Brands - Neosho Service Center
Newell Brands - Neosho Service Center (259 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Newell Brands - Neosho Service Center has more employees than the General warehousing and storage median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.8 0.0 2 0 0
2023 0.7 0.4 2 0 0
2022 0.8 0.4 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · MO · Neosho

9,477 General warehousing and storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 53 employers in Neosho, MO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Wabtec Manufacturing Solutions TXD 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lakeside Book Company - Brighton Beach 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Branch 5508 - WP Harvey West B 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR DLA Barstow 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Control Devices 259 FTE
STATE-SIZE 815 259 FTE
STATE-SIZE 820 259 FTE
STATE-SIZE 0368 - SOUTH ST LOUIS MO WHSE 259 FTE
CITY-NEAR La-Z-Boy Midwest 798 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 17 388 FTE
CITY-NEAR 17 356 FTE
CITY-NEAR Neosho Distribution Center & Warehouse 337 FTE
NAT-TCR Snider Fleet Solutions - Richland Walker Cir 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR LANXESS Corporation 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Metro Site Fabricators, LLC 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Branch 5508 - WP Harvey West B 0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Benedettini Cabinets, LP 259 FTE
NAT-SIZE Terrace of Hialeah 259 FTE
NAT-SIZE Powers and Sons, LLC 259 FTE
NAT-SIZE Commercial Solar Solutions, LLC 259 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.