Manufacturer of Recreational Vehicles · Indiana

Newmar Corporation

Nappanee, IN · ~964 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Newmar Corporation runs at 243% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Manufacturer of Recreational Vehicles workplace, earning a grade F.

Newmar Corporation: 8.0 TCR = 243% of Manufacturer of Recreational Vehicles BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Newmar Corporation safety composite

Newmar Corporation scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 57% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 35%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 8.02 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.69 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.8

2016→2024

Newmar Corporation injury rate improved

Newmar Corporation's TCR fell 4.8 from 8.7 in 2016 to 3.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 10.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.21× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=8.7 · 2017=8.5 · 2018=10.9 · 2019=9.6 · 2020=7.4 · 2021=10.6 · 2022=6.9 · 2023=5.8 · 2024=3.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336213 · Nappanee, IN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 8.0 · 243% of ind

  • DART 1.7 DART
  • RANK #37/66
  • PHOTO Thor Motor Coach/Pla…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 523 inj
  • SIZE ~964 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Thor Motor Coach/Plant 250 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Newmar Corporation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Newmar Corporation averages 8.0 TCR (243% of the Manufacturer of Recreational Vehicles BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Newmar Corporation TCR series: 2016=8.7 · 2017=8.5 · 2018=10.9 · 2019=9.6 · 2020=7.4 · 2021=10.6 · 2022=6.9 · 2023=5.8 · 2024=3.9 · BLS 3.3

Where Newmar Corporation falls in its industry

97 Manufacturer of Recreational V establishments

Safer than 35% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #37 safest of 66 Manufacturer of Recreational V employers in Indiana.

Newmar Corporation (964 employees, TCR 8.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 165 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Newmar Corporation
Newmar Corporation (964 employees, TCR 8.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 165 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Newmar Corporation has more employees than the Manufacturer of Recreational Vehicles median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.9 1.7 24 1 0
2023 5.8 2.7 43 2 0
2022 6.9 4.2 57 14 0
2021 10.6 6.5 86 19 0
2020 7.4 5.0 48 8 0
2019 9.6 4.2 74 13 0
2018 10.9 4.3 81 16 0
2017 8.5 2.8 49 15 0
2016 8.7 2.7 61 4 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336213 · IN · Nappanee

97 Manufacturer of Recreational Vehicles employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 38 employers in Nappanee, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Thor Motor Coach/Plant 250 8.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Keystone RV Plant 4 8.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Thor Motor Coach/Plant 750 8.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Thor Motor Coach/WH/CNC 8.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE 181-DC181 964 FTE
STATE-SIZE 7055 964 FTE
STATE-SIZE 6017 963 FTE
STATE-SIZE North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : IND5 965 FTE
CITY-NEAR Aluminum Trailer Company 469 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gulf Stream Plant 51 376 FTE
CITY-NEAR Shawnee St 281 FTE
CITY-NEAR ATC Trailers 266 FTE
NAT-TCR Lowell 8.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Owsley Health Care Center, Inc 8.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Pioneer Forge Div. of Powers and Sons, LLC 8.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Des Moines Jim Hawk Truck Trailers, Inc. 8.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Charleston Stevedoring Company, LLC 964 FTE
NAT-SIZE Contech Control Services, Inc. 964 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dallas 964 FTE
NAT-SIZE Shoeneckers Inc dba BI Worldwide 964 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.