Paper products, die-cut office supply, made from purchased paper or paperboard · Pennsylvania

N.F. String & Son Inc.

Harrisburg, PA · ~34 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

N.F. String & Son Inc. runs at 308% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Paper products, die-cut office supply, made from purchased paper or paperboard workplace, earning a grade F.

N.F. String & Son Inc.: 10.2 TCR = 308% of Paper products, die-cut office supply, made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

N.F. String & Son Inc. safety composite

N.F. String & Son Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

22/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

N.F. String & Son Inc.: 10.3 → 16.1 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 16.1 TCR · DART/TCR 0.32× in 2024

N.F. String & Son Inc.'s TCR rose 5.8 from 10.3 in 2017 to 16.1 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.32× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322230 · Harrisburg, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.2 · 308% of ind

  • DART 3.2 DART
  • RANK #16/17
  • PHOTO NPC - Wisconsin
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~34 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: NPC - Wisconsin (0.3 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

N.F. String & Son Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows N.F. String & Son Inc. averages 10.2 TCR (308% of the Paper products, die-cut office supply, made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

N.F. String & Son Inc. TCR series: 2017=10.3 · 2018=16 · 2019=3.3 · 2020=4.7 · 2022=8.6 · 2023=12.1 · 2024=16.1 · BLS 3.3

Where N.F. String & Son Inc. falls in its industry

122 Paper products, die-cut office establishments

Safer than 3% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #16 safest of 17 Paper products, die-cut office employers in Pennsylvania.

N.F. String & Son Inc. (34 employees, TCR 10.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate N.F. String & Son Inc.
N.F. String & Son Inc. (34 employees, TCR 10.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 2.6

N.F. String & Son Inc. has fewer employees than the Paper products, die-cut office supply, m median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 16.1 3.2 5 0 0
2023 12.1 3.0 4 0 0
2022 8.6 0.0 2 0 0
2020 4.7 4.7 0 1 0
2019 3.3 0.0 1 0 0
2018 16.0 0.0 2 2 0
2017 10.3 6.9 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322230 · PA · Harrisburg

122 Paper products, die-cut office supply, made from purchased paper or paperboard employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 362 employers in Harrisburg, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR NPC - Wisconsin 9.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Heinrich Envelope - 0012 9.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Classic Envelope 8.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR NPC - PA 12.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Kaolin Mushroom Farms - West Grove Facility 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE George Didden Greenhouse 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kreider Farms - Dairy 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE R.W. Sauder Inc 34 FTE
CITY-NEAR UPMC Pinnacle Hospitals 4,843 FTE
CITY-NEAR PHS/HARRISBURG HOSPITAL 2,703 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pinnacle Health Medical Services 2,426 FTE
CITY-NEAR UPMC Pinnacle 2,311 FTE
NAT-TCR Ekedal Concrete Inc. 10.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Wonder Lake Fire Protection District 10.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Schwab Rehabilitation Hospital 10.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Palm Garden of Vero Beach, LLC 10.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Air Products and Chemicals Inc.- Port Arthur Facility 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wrenshall City Hall 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE A.H. Stock Mfg. 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Styline Logistics North Carolina Warehouse 34 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.