Wind powered turbine generator sets manufacturing · Texas

NGC Transmission Equipment America

Fort Worth, TX · ~100 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

NGC Transmission Equipment America runs at 69% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Wind powered turbine generator sets manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

NGC Transmission Equipment America: 2.3 TCR = 69% of Wind powered turbine generator sets manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

NGC Transmission Equipment America safety composite

NGC Transmission Equipment America scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 19%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

36/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.27 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.5

2022→2024

NGC Transmission Equipment America injury rate improved

NGC Transmission Equipment America's TCR fell 1.5 from 3.7 in 2022 to 2.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 3.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.96× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=3.7 · 2023=0.9 · 2024=2.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333611 · Fort Worth, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.3 · 69% of ind

  • DART 2.2 DART
  • RANK #8/12
  • PHOTO MHPSA
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~100 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: MHPSA (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

NGC Transmission Equipment America in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows NGC Transmission Equipment America averages 2.3 TCR (69% of the Wind powered turbine generator sets manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

NGC Transmission Equipment America TCR series: 2022=3.7 · 2023=0.9 · 2024=2.2 · BLS 3.3

Where NGC Transmission Equipment America falls in its industry

97 Wind powered turbine generator establishments

Safer than 41% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 12 Wind powered turbine generator employers in Texas.

NGC Transmission Equipment America (100 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 141 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate NGC Transmission Equipment America
NGC Transmission Equipment America (100 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 141 employees and a TCR of 2.0

NGC Transmission Equipment America has fewer employees than the Wind powered turbine generator sets manu median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.2 2.2 2 0 0
2023 0.9 0.9 1 0 0
2022 3.7 3.7 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333611 · TX · Fort Worth

97 Wind powered turbine generator sets manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 1,346 employers in Fort Worth, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR MHPSA 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hi Tech Honeycomb 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Solar Turbines Incorporated DWLA Office 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Solar Turbines Inc. DENY Office 2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Revol Greens - TX 100 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dakota Utility Contractors LLC 100 FTE
STATE-SIZE McClung Energy Services, LLC 100 FTE
STATE-SIZE HCI03-FPC 100 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation US TX Fort Worth Lockheed Blvd (1093) 16,547 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation Fort Worth Campus (1093) 13,805 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cook Children's Medical Center 4,998 FTE
CITY-NEAR TX- Fort Worth 4,667 FTE
NAT-TCR City of Ames - Ames Public Library 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Heath - 840 Thornwood Drive 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Winebow-SC 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Heidtman Steel Products Inc.-Butler Sheet 2.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Pursuit Packages LLC 100 FTE
NAT-SIZE Secondline Logistics 100 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Nogales Usd 1 100 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gator Grading & Paving 100 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.