Industry profile · NAICS 333611

Water turbines manufacturing

Workplace injury rates across 94 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

94
Employers
2.6
Avg TCR
3.3
BLS benchmark
1,746
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Water turbines manufacturing average 2.6 recordable injuries per 100 workers, below the BLS national benchmark of 3.3.

2.6
avg TCR · reporting employers
3.3
BLS national benchmark
94
employers reporting
1,746
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Water turbines manufacturing Safety Data Reveals

The Water turbines manufacturing sector (NAICS 333611) encompasses 94 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 1,746 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 2.6 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 3.3 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 2.6 is below the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Water turbines manufacturing that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 1 of 3
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
Composites West Burlington, IA F 21.1
Triax Indusries Chandler, AZ F 8.9
Melling Products Farwell, MI F 8.2
EMP Escanaba, MI F 7.4
Aero Manufacturing Corporation Beverly, MA F 7.1
ZF Gainesville-03 Flowery Branch, GA F 7.1
Vestas Nacelles America, Inc. Brighton, CO F 6.7
Solar Turbines Incorporated DECH Office Naperville, IL D 5.5
Power Services : Richmond, VA, USA (Service Factory) Richmond, VA D 5.3
NGMS-A700 Sunnyvale, CA D 5.1
Molded Fiber Glass Companies - West Adelanto, CA D 5.0
ZF Gainesville-02 Gainesville, GA D 4.5
ZF Gainesville-01 Gainesville, GA D 4.4
Freeman-Batavia Batavia, OH D 4.3
Innovative Machining Technology, Inc. Boyertown, PA Boyertown, PA D 4.3
Solar Turbines Incorporated DSLF Office Lafayette, LA D 4.0
AES Wind Generation Palm Springs North Palm Springs, CA D 4.0
Blade Dynamics, US New Orleans, LA C 3.9
GE Gas Power - Bangor Bangor, ME C 3.8
Tpi Composites Santa Teresa Santa Teresa Nm., NM C 3.6
Hydro : Hydro - NAM - Projects (US Only) Greenwood Village, CO C 3.6
Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy, Hutchinson KS Huthcinson, KS C 3.6
Aeris Services League City, TX C 3.6
Nationwide Boiler, Inc. - Fremont Fremont, CA C 3.6
Nationwide Boiler Inc. Fremont, CA C 3.3
Solar Turbines Incorporated DWOD Office Midland, TX C 3.3
GSC : Bangor, ME, USA Bangor, ME C 3.2
Solar Turbines Incorporated Chicago District Office Naperville, IL C 3.2
Gas Power Systems : Bangor, ME, USA Bangor, ME C 2.8
Vestas Blades America Windsor, CO C 2.7
SEW-EURODRIVE, Inc Hayward, CA B 2.6
Gas Power Systems : Schenectady, NY, USA Schenectady, NY B 2.6
LM Wind Power : Little Rock Little Rock, AR B 2.6
GE Vernova Amarillo, TX Amarillo, TX B 2.6
Trinity Turbine Technology, LP Rosharon, TX B 2.5
Stauffer Diesel Ephrata, PA B 2.5
American Hydro Corporation, York, PA York, PA B 2.4
Solar Turbines Inc. DENY Office Upper Saddle River, NJ B 2.4
Solar Turbines Incorporated DWLA Office Irvine, CA B 2.3
Hi Tech Honeycomb San Diego, CA B 2.3
NGC Transmission Equipment America Fort Worth, TX B 2.3
MHPSA Orlando, FL B 2.3
Voith Hydro, Inc. York, PA B 2.1
LM Wind Power : Grand Forks Grand Forks, ND B 2.1
Solar Turbines incorporated DSHO Office Houston, TX B 2.1
PCC Airfoils LLC - Mentor Plant Mentor, OH B 2.0
GE Vernova Pensacola FL Pensacola, FL B 2.0
LM Wind Power Grand Forks, ND B 2.0
Gas Power Systems : Greenville, SC, USA Greenville, SC B 2.0
Babbitting Services Inc Illinois - South Elgin, IL B 1.9
Page 1 of 3 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Water turbines manufacturing?

This sector averages 2.6 against a BLS benchmark of 3.3 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.