Search, Detection, Navigation, Guidance, Aeronautical, and Nautical System and Instrument Manufacturing · Colorado

NGMS-N632

Boulder, CO · ~244 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

NGMS-N632 runs at 25% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Search, Detection, Navigation, Guidance, Aeronautical, and Nautical System and Instrument Manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

NGMS-N632: 0.8 TCR = 25% of Search, Detection, Navigation, Guidance, Aeronautical, and Nautical System and Instrument Manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

NGMS-N632 safety composite

NGMS-N632 scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 75% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 45%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 0.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.3

2017→2021

NGMS-N632 injury rate improved

NGMS-N632's TCR fell 1.3 from 1.3 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2019 at 1.5 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=1.3 · 2018=1.2 · 2019=1.5 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334511 · Boulder, CO AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.8 · 25% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #17/23
  • PHOTO IRF Intelligent RF S…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~244 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: IRF Intelligent RF Solutions LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Colorado employers → · Look up another →

NGMS-N632 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows NGMS-N632 averages 0.8 TCR (25% of the Search, Detection, Navigation, Guidance, Aeronautical, and Nautical System and Instrument Manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

NGMS-N632 TCR series: 2017=1.3 · 2018=1.2 · 2019=1.5 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · BLS 3.3

Where NGMS-N632 falls in its industry

388 Search, Detection, Navigation, establishments

Safer than 45% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Colorado alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #17 safest of 23 Search, Detection, Navigation, employers in Colorado.

NGMS-N632 (244 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 207 employees and a TCR of 0.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate NGMS-N632
NGMS-N632 (244 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 207 employees and a TCR of 0.7

NGMS-N632 has more employees than the Search, Detection, Navigation, Guidance, median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 1.5 1.1 4 0 0
2018 1.2 0.4 3 0 0
2017 1.3 1.3 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334511 · CO · Boulder

388 Search, Detection, Navigation, Guidance, Aeronautical, and Nautical System and Instrument Manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,007 rated employers in Colorado with headcount on file · 190 employers in Boulder, CO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR IRF Intelligent RF Solutions LLC 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lockheed Martin Corporation Syracuse Campus (1021) 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR HoneywellFL49 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bowmar LLC 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Frac Shack America Inc 244 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rocky Mountain 244 FTE
STATE-SIZE 620-00107 244 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2183 - Brighton 244 FTE
CITY-NEAR Boulder Campus 1,554 FTE
CITY-NEAR Foothills Campus 1,368 FTE
CITY-NEAR Measurement Solutions-Boulder Flow 761 FTE
CITY-NEAR Flow Measurement Products 711 FTE
NAT-TCR 49731g - Tucson Zone 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Renfro - K. Bell 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Emerson Retail Solutions 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Berry Global Inc. (Pryor, OK Facility) 0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Valley Enterprises-Ubly Inc 244 FTE
NAT-SIZE Heartland Fabrication, LLC. 244 FTE
NAT-SIZE Richard M. Campbell Nursing Home 244 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cincinnati Headquarters 244 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.