Water, naturally carbonated, purifying and bottling · Texas

Niagara Bottling, LLC - Baytown

Baytown, TX · ~60 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Niagara Bottling, LLC - Baytown runs at 63% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Water, naturally carbonated, purifying and bottling workplace, earning a grade B.

Niagara Bottling, LLC - Baytown: 2.1 TCR = 63% of Water, naturally carbonated, purifying and bottling BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Niagara Bottling, LLC - Baytown safety composite

Niagara Bottling, LLC - Baytown scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 60% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 46%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.09 per 100 workers

Safer than 60% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.46 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.4

2022→2024

Niagara Bottling, LLC - Baytown injury rate improved

Niagara Bottling, LLC - Baytown's TCR fell 0.4 from 1.8 in 2022 to 1.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 3.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.7× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=1.8 · 2023=3.0 · 2024=1.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 312112 · Baytown, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.1 · 63% of ind

  • DART 1.5 DART
  • RANK #16/21
  • PHOTO Niagara Bottling LLC…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~60 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Niagara Bottling LLC - Alabama (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Niagara Bottling, LLC - Baytown in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Niagara Bottling, LLC - Baytown averages 2.1 TCR (63% of the Water, naturally carbonated, purifying and bottling BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Niagara Bottling, LLC - Baytown TCR series: 2022=1.8 · 2023=3 · 2024=1.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Niagara Bottling, LLC - Baytown falls in its industry

192 Water, naturally carbonated, p establishments

Safer than 60% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #16 safest of 21 Water, naturally carbonated, p employers in Texas.

Niagara Bottling, LLC - Baytown (60 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 98 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Niagara Bottling, LLC - Baytown
Niagara Bottling, LLC - Baytown (60 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 98 employees and a TCR of 2.6

Niagara Bottling, LLC - Baytown has fewer employees than the Water, naturally carbonated, purifying a median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.5 1.5 1 0 0
2023 3.0 3.0 2 0 0
2022 1.8 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

312112 · TX · Baytown

192 Water, naturally carbonated, purifying and bottling employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 247 employers in Baytown, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Niagara Bottling LLC - Alabama 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR BlueTriton Los Angeles Factory 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Niagara Bottling, LLC - Allentown 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hall's Culligan Water 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Frontier Feedlot Dublin LLC 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE Waelder 1 Complex 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE ACRT, Inc. Arlington TX 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE VES Survey International 60 FTE
CITY-NEAR North American Growth Olefins Recovery Project 2,988 FTE
CITY-NEAR Houston Methodist Baytown Hospital 1,920 FTE
CITY-NEAR ExxonMobil Baytown Refinery 1,328 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 7042 1,288 FTE
NAT-TCR Southern Equipment & Crew, LLC 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Pinnacle Corrugated, LLC 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR double kwik Salyersville 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Chandler Industries - Long Prairie 2.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Crown Building Products of FL LLC 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE AHL Simi Valley 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE Howard Sheppard - Garden City 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE Aerosafe Global - Sparks, NV 60 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.