Corrugated paper made from purchased paper or paperboard · North Carolina

Pinnacle Corrugated, LLC

Landis, NC · ~83 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pinnacle Corrugated, LLC runs at 63% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Corrugated paper made from purchased paper or paperboard workplace, earning a grade B.

Pinnacle Corrugated, LLC: 2.1 TCR = 63% of Corrugated paper made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pinnacle Corrugated, LLC safety composite

Pinnacle Corrugated, LLC scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 56% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 17%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

41/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.09 per 100 workers

Safer than 56% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Pinnacle Corrugated, LLC: 1.1 → 3.4 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 3.5 TCR · DART/TCR 1.64× in 2024

Pinnacle Corrugated, LLC's TCR rose 2.3 from 1.1 in 2017 to 3.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 3.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.64× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322211 · Landis, NC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.1 · 63% of ind

  • DART 3.4 DART
  • RANK #40/61
  • PHOTO Down River - Stockton
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~83 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Down River - Stockton (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Pinnacle Corrugated, LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Pinnacle Corrugated, LLC averages 2.1 TCR (63% of the Corrugated paper made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Pinnacle Corrugated, LLC TCR series: 2017=1.1 · 2018=1.1 · 2020=0 · 2021=3.5 · 2022=3.3 · 2023=2.3 · 2024=3.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Pinnacle Corrugated, LLC falls in its industry

1,338 Corrugated paper made from pur establishments

Safer than 56% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #40 safest of 61 Corrugated paper made from pur employers in North Carolina.

Pinnacle Corrugated, LLC (83 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0123456 Average employees Total Case Rate Pinnacle Corrugated, LLC
Pinnacle Corrugated, LLC (83 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4

Pinnacle Corrugated, LLC has fewer employees than the Corrugated paper made from purchased pap median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.4 3.4 3 0 0
2023 2.3 2.3 2 0 0
2022 3.3 2.2 1 2 0
2021 3.5 1.1 2 1 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 1.1 0.0 0 1 0
2017 1.1 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322211 · NC · Landis

1,338 Corrugated paper made from purchased paper or paperboard employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 4 employers in Landis, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Down River - Stockton 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 5507 Toledo Manufacturing 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Liberty Carton - Golden Valley, MN 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Camillus Container 2.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE ROCKWELL FARMS INC 83 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gastonia Operations Center 83 FTE
STATE-SIZE D.R. Horton, Inc. - Greensboro 83 FTE
STATE-SIZE Raleigh-Durham Call Center 83 FTE
CITY-NEAR Haskells Hardware LLC 117 FTE
CITY-NEAR Plant 23 89 FTE
CITY-NEAR Southeast Hydroblasting 19 FTE
NAT-TCR Niagara Bottling, LLC - Baytown 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR double kwik Salyersville 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Chandler Industries - Long Prairie 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Southern Equipment & Crew, LLC 2.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Bridge House LLC 83 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ray Martin Company Inc 83 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dublin, OH - 425 Metro Place Suite 500 83 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jackson Hospital - EVS 83 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.