Water, naturally carbonated, purifying and bottling · Pennsylvania

Niagara Bottling, LLC - Hazleton

Hazle Township, PA · ~255 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Niagara Bottling, LLC - Hazleton runs at 16% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Water, naturally carbonated, purifying and bottling workplace, earning a grade A.

Niagara Bottling, LLC - Hazleton: 0.5 TCR = 16% of Water, naturally carbonated, purifying and bottling BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Niagara Bottling, LLC - Hazleton safety composite

Niagara Bottling, LLC - Hazleton scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 93% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

68/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 93% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.11 per 100 workers

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Niagara Bottling, LLC - Hazleton: 0.0 → 1.1 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 1.1 TCR · DART/TCR 2.06× in 2024

Niagara Bottling, LLC - Hazleton's TCR rose 1.1 from 0.0 in 2021 to 1.1 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 2.06× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 312112 · Hazle Township, PA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.5 · 16% of ind

  • DART 1.1 DART
  • RANK #3/24
  • PHOTO Supplying Demand Inc…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~255 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Supplying Demand Inc. dba Liquid Death (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Niagara Bottling, LLC - Hazleton in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Niagara Bottling, LLC - Hazleton averages 0.5 TCR (16% of the Water, naturally carbonated, purifying and bottling BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Niagara Bottling, LLC - Hazleton TCR series: 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=1.1 · 2024=1.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Niagara Bottling, LLC - Hazleton falls in its industry

192 Water, naturally carbonated, p establishments

Safer than 93% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 24 Water, naturally carbonated, p employers in Pennsylvania.

Niagara Bottling, LLC - Hazleton (255 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 98 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Niagara Bottling, LLC - Hazleton
Niagara Bottling, LLC - Hazleton (255 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 98 employees and a TCR of 2.6

Niagara Bottling, LLC - Hazleton has more employees than the Water, naturally carbonated, purifying a median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.1 1.1 4 0 0
2023 1.1 0.7 3 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

312112 · PA · Hazle Township

192 Water, naturally carbonated, purifying and bottling employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 36 employers in Hazle Township, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Supplying Demand Inc. dba Liquid Death 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Niagara Bottling, LLC - Phoenix 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Niagara Bottling, LLC - Dallas 1 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Niagara Bottling, LLC - Corporate 0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE 946-NiSource-Smithfield PA-Cust Serv Ctr 255 FTE
STATE-SIZE Joe Jurgielewicz & Son LTD 255 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pepperidge Farm Downingtown 255 FTE
STATE-SIZE Yuasa Battery Inc. 255 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hazleton Distribution Center 972 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Hershey Co Hazleton 701 FTE
CITY-NEAR 9720 633 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hershey - Hazleton Plant 533 FTE
NAT-TCR 5608 - Springfield-MO 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Oerlikon Balzers Coating USA Inc - Amherst, NY 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Aclara Technologies, LLC - Solon 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Thunder Bay Community Health Service, Inc Hilman 0.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE 8010155 MARS Petcare Columbus 255 FTE
NAT-SIZE PAM Specialty Hospital Victoria North 255 FTE
NAT-SIZE 872 - Pleasant Prairie Fresh Str 255 FTE
NAT-SIZE 170 - Highland IN 255 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.