Beverages, naturally carbonated bottled water, manufacturing · California

Niagara Bottling, LLC - Stockton

Stockton, CA · ~84 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Niagara Bottling, LLC - Stockton runs at 40% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Beverages, naturally carbonated bottled water, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Niagara Bottling, LLC - Stockton: 1.3 TCR = 40% of Beverages, naturally carbonated bottled water, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Niagara Bottling, LLC - Stockton safety composite

Niagara Bottling, LLC - Stockton scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 83% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

72/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Niagara Bottling, LLC - Stockton held a steady TCR band

Niagara Bottling, LLC - Stockton's TCR held near 0.1 from 1.1 in 2017 to 1.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 3.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=1.1 · 2018=1.2 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=1.1 · 2021=2.4 · 2022=3.5 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=1.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 312112 · Stockton, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.3 · 40% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #8/31
  • PHOTO Blue Triton Brands
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~84 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Blue Triton Brands (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Niagara Bottling, LLC - Stockton in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Niagara Bottling, LLC - Stockton averages 1.3 TCR (40% of the Beverages, naturally carbonated bottled water, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Niagara Bottling, LLC - Stockton TCR series: 2017=1.1 · 2018=1.2 · 2019=0 · 2020=1.1 · 2021=2.4 · 2022=3.5 · 2023=0 · 2024=1.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Niagara Bottling, LLC - Stockton falls in its industry

192 Beverages, naturally carbonate establishments

Safer than 77% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 31 Beverages, naturally carbonate employers in California.

Niagara Bottling, LLC - Stockton (84 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 98 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Niagara Bottling, LLC - Stockton
Niagara Bottling, LLC - Stockton (84 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 98 employees and a TCR of 2.6

Niagara Bottling, LLC - Stockton has fewer employees than the Beverages, naturally carbonated bottled median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.3 0.0 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 3.5 1.2 1 2 0
2021 2.4 2.4 2 0 0
2020 1.1 1.1 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 1.2 1.2 1 0 0
2017 1.1 1.1 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

312112 · CA · Stockton

192 Beverages, naturally carbonated bottled water, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 605 employers in Stockton, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Blue Triton Brands 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Niagara Bottling, LLC - Miami 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Niagara Bottling, LLC - Mooresville 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Niagara Bottling, LLC - Mississippi 1.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE montalvo farms 84 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hansen Custom Farming, LLC 84 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hilarides Dairy 84 FTE
STATE-SIZE McIntyre Labor Service, LLC. 84 FTE
CITY-NEAR LaSalette Care and Rehabilitation Center 5,249 FTE
CITY-NEAR SCKCX0ABX SCK - ABX 4,573 FTE
CITY-NEAR CA-18 4,525 FTE
CITY-NEAR CDCR CA Health Care Facility 3,227 FTE
NAT-TCR IRL Systems, Inc. 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Jfp Enterprises Inc 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 81-20 Randolph 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Todd County Courthouse 1.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE PATCO Electrical Services, Inc. 84 FTE
NAT-SIZE MediLodge of Sault Ste. Marie 84 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fire 84 FTE
NAT-SIZE ASPC- Winslow/ Apache 84 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.