Distribution of electric power · Indiana

NineStar Connect-South Campus

Greenfield, IN · ~90 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
3.3
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

NineStar Connect-South Campus runs at 273% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Distribution of electric power workplace, earning a grade F.

NineStar Connect-South Campus: 3.3 TCR = 273% of Distribution of electric power BLS 1.2 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

NineStar Connect-South Campus safety composite

NineStar Connect-South Campus scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 11%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

32/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.28 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.77 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

NineStar Connect-South Campus: 0.0 → 5.7 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 6.0 TCR · DART/TCR 1.45× in 2024

NineStar Connect-South Campus's TCR rose 5.7 from 0.0 in 2016 to 5.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 6.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.45× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · Greenfield, IN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 3.3 · 273% of ind

  • DART 4.8 DART
  • RANK #57/87
  • PHOTO Sylmar Converter Sta…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 25 inj
  • SIZE ~90 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Sylmar Converter Station (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

NineStar Connect-South Campus in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows NineStar Connect-South Campus averages 3.3 TCR (273% of the Distribution of electric power BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

NineStar Connect-South Campus TCR series: 2016=0 · 2018=4.6 · 2019=3.4 · 2020=2.3 · 2021=3.2 · 2022=1 · 2023=6 · 2024=5.7 · BLS 1.2

Where NineStar Connect-South Campus falls in its industry

2,958 Distribution of electric power establishments

Safer than 39% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #57 safest of 87 Distribution of electric power employers in Indiana.

NineStar Connect-South Campus (90 employees, TCR 3.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate NineStar Connect-South Campus
NineStar Connect-South Campus (90 employees, TCR 3.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

NineStar Connect-South Campus has more employees than the Distribution of electric power median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.7 4.8 6 0 0
2023 6.0 1.0 6 0 0
2022 1.0 1.0 1 0 0
2021 3.2 2.1 3 0 0
2020 2.3 1.1 2 0 0
2019 3.4 1.1 3 0 0
2018 4.6 3.4 4 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · IN · Greenfield

2,958 Distribution of electric power employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 126 employers in Greenfield, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Sylmar Converter Station 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sendero Power Line Construction, Inc. 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR San Carlos Location 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Travelers Rest Operations Center 3.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE The Skillman Corporation 90 FTE
STATE-SIZE E & B PAVING LLC - Kokomo 90 FTE
STATE-SIZE Peterman 90 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mission Mechanical Corp 90 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - MQJ1 2,520 FTE
CITY-NEAR Executive Management Services, Inc 2,096 FTE
CITY-NEAR Elanco Animal Health, Greenfield 1,693 FTE
CITY-NEAR Elanco Headquarters 1,453 FTE
NAT-TCR Jacksonville FL Truss 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Columbia SC Millwork 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR South Boston, DC 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Forsyth Hatchery 3.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Houston Distribution Center 90 FTE
NAT-SIZE Chelmsford 90 FTE
NAT-SIZE Vistar Florida - 1060 90 FTE
NAT-SIZE Foodservice Metro NY Bldg 2 - 0612 90 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.