Heavy machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services · Nebraska

NMC Group Gering

Gering, NE · ~28 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.0
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

NMC Group Gering runs at 334% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Heavy machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services workplace, earning a grade F.

NMC Group Gering: 7.0 TCR = 334% of Heavy machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services BLS 2.1 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

NMC Group Gering safety composite

NMC Group Gering scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 76% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 10%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.01 per 100 workers

Safer than 10% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.5

2016→2021

NMC Group Gering injury rate improved

NMC Group Gering's TCR fell 8.5 from 12.3 in 2016 to 3.8 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2016 at 12.3 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=12.3 · 2017=3.3 · 2018=11.4 · 2019=11.2 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=3.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 811310 · Gering, NE ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.0 · 334% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #33/38
  • PHOTO Pacific Power Group …
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~28 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Pacific Power Group - Perkins Ridgefield (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Nebraska employers → · Look up another →

NMC Group Gering in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows NMC Group Gering averages 7.0 TCR (334% of the Heavy machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

NMC Group Gering TCR series: 2016=12.3 · 2017=3.3 · 2018=11.4 · 2019=11.2 · 2020=0 · 2021=3.8 · BLS 2.1

Where NMC Group Gering falls in its industry

2,560 Heavy machinery and equipment establishments

Safer than 10% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Nebraska alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #33 safest of 38 Heavy machinery and equipment employers in Nebraska.

NMC Group Gering (28 employees, TCR 7.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate NMC Group Gering
NMC Group Gering (28 employees, TCR 7.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7

NMC Group Gering has fewer employees than the Heavy machinery and equipment repair and median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 3.8 0.0 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 11.2 7.5 3 0 0
2018 11.4 0.0 3 0 0
2017 3.3 0.0 1 0 0
2016 12.3 9.2 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

811310 · NE · Gering

2,560 Heavy machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 3,594 rated employers in Nebraska with headcount on file · 12 employers in Gering, NE · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Pacific Power Group - Perkins Ridgefield 7.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Southern Field Welding 7.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Koffler Electrical Mechanical Apparatus Repair, Inc. 7.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 222 Dublin LOC 7.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Central Sand & Gravel Co - Shop 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sargent Drilling Co 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Southern Iowa/Missouri Region 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Celebrity Homes Inc. 28 FTE
CITY-NEAR Heritage Estates 153 FTE
CITY-NEAR Paul Reed Construction & Supply, Inc. 104 FTE
CITY-NEAR CS Precision Manufacturing 75 FTE
CITY-NEAR B&C Steel Corporation 54 FTE
NAT-TCR Southern MN Beet Sugar Cooperative 7.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Pepro Enterprises Inc 7.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Burke Industries (San Jose, CA) 7.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Advantage Glass LLC 7.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Mount Julliet DVJ 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Preferred Cartage Service Inc JBS Greeley 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE J J Cardosi Inc 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Big Lots Store #4155 ALHAMBRA, CA 28 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.